Galactic Magnetic field . And B.H.

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by river, Jul 26, 2020.

  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Well they don't .
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,096
    Now watch what mathematical patterns waves can form depending on mere dynamic vibrations. This is the mathematical art form of creating self-forming "resonance patterns" in physical media.


    Now visualize this in 3D, and 13.5 billion years of evolving complexity..!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2020
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,096
    It's a Mathematical Law that in a fluid, such as spacetime, an object dropped or moving independently in that fluid creates an outward wave function in the fluid (spacetime).
    The impact of the object creates a small kinetic explosion and I don't think you are objecting to the concept that an explosion is primarily an outward function as opposed to implosion.

    Our Earth is not a static object. It is in constant movement (wobble) in a fluid medium (spacetime). It creates outward waves from that dynamic motion.
    Note that the medium remains stationary, it's only the wave function that travels horizontally, not the medium the wave "rides" on.

    Gravity is a different horse. The Earth's mass causes a constant spacetime warp around itself, a "gravity well", from which wobble waves travel upward along the warped spacetime fabric......

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2020
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The continued trolling and avoidance in answering questions, and/or quoting references, or stating evidence to support his nonsense, rolls on and on and on. This troll believes we should all accept "so what" and "well they don't" child like utterances, as reasons to support his anti science stance.
    Not sure, but isn't there something in the rules for someone continuing this behavour, even in the fringes?
     

Share This Page