I think it is very unfair, harsh and manipulative to have a fringe forum that is open for discussions of the paranormal etc but expecting scientific proof when we all know there isnt one, yet. Why have a subforum like that unless its just to bully people who open topics for speculation. The naysayers have nothing to add except the usual 'no proof, then its bs, the end' essentially wanting to shut it down. Its setting people up for them to be bullied, condescended to, or infracted. Also, the most obvious is those who arent even at least curiously open-minded just go into that subforum just to block any speculation or possibilities except the most banal explanation everyone already is aware of when it comes to the unexplained or yet to be proven. The one size fits all 'must be imagination, mental illness, mistaken identity so shut up now' to all and any attempt to start a topic. No, they then need to stay out of a topic they obviously arent interested in. Its like going into a certain hobby or interest convention telling everybody there how you think their interest is silly. Its just wrong. Period. Its not the science section. Repeat: its not the science section. Repeat again: its not the fuking science section. The way that subforum is not understood in context. If the moderators are going to be that much of an anvil, they should apply the same exacting, hard knock on wood, standards to the philosophy subforum since thats all personal opinion and interpretation touted as truth. It would stop any discussion from getgo. Heh.