Sorry to burst the magical bubble of two entities causing cold and frost on the windshield and electromechanical failures to boot, but last time I checked, men predominated the sexual molestation field! Or do you mean this FIGURATIVELY?
Sounds like men, alright. I don't know how, but I'm sure this violent act was committed to ensure their sexual "viability" and to demonstrate their potency and virility to the women. In the biological world, might often equates to right! I mean, what woman in her right mind would pass up the offer to have THAT MAN'S child?!?!? If I was a woman, I'd be getting that man's sperm every chance I got! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Well, I guess missionary doesn't always mean "Light Worker"! (that was for you fans of New Age jargon!) And what was the "abuse"? Is this something that would be perfectly acceptable if it were done to a woman (making a pass, as they say)? What makes it abuse when it is done by one male to another male? Abuse is a pretty hefty accusation, which usually implies a certain degree of unprovoked hostility and harm towards the victim. Do women (some of the brightest among them, that is) not consider being treated as a sex object abuse? Apparently not the women that YOU hang around. The size of the breasts is generally converse to the amount of intellegence. Generally, that is... Just wondering what the big difference is, other than biological gender.
Interestingly, not to discourage you, but your analysis of men's behaviour is not quite correct. Since straight men so suppress their sexual need for men, the need itself becomes a lot negative. Straight men like homoseuxal men cannot enjoy male-male love when its open and 'mushy'. Their social training makes it unpalatable for them. But it comes out in several negative ways. Most straight men can only give vent to their sexual need for other men when they are in positions of power over the men who are 'victims' and their is a social excuse (e.g. a custom). The above incidence was one of 'hazing'. Sexual humiliation of men has an immense sexual value for straight men --- and turns them on. And the worst kind of sexual humilication for a man is to be humiliated in front of women --- they call it CFNM. So men subject other men to it because they derive immense sexual pleasure out of it. Sexual humiliation of a man, especially in front of women, also denudes him of his pretenses and of 'social masculinity' which also adds immensely to the sexual value of this.I have observed and analysed several such cases. Including the way Iraqi prisoners of wars were treated by the US soldiers. Of course no man worth his name would admit that it has any male erotic value attached to it. But then what's new! Otherwise, if were to believe in the American hogwash that men get extremely put off by male eroticism, then the last thing the macho guys in power would want to do is to see the men naked. Hazing, whether in my society or in yours, often involves making the boy naked and asking him to masturbate. Now their social masculinity prevents men from doing masturbation on the other guy, so they make do with watching him. And the fact that he is being humiliated (more so if a girl is present) makes it all the more hot for these men. It's all becaue their sexuality for men has been so negativised.
Abuse than stands highest of all on the top of savagery, which threaten the reporductive fabric of my society.
Is there some biological reason for this? I thought males hit puberty later than females. Statutory rape laws don't work that way.
Yeah, there is! The young male's little dick gets hard and he's actually able to perform intercourse ...and that's 'cause he's excited and wants to fuck!! If the male did NOT want to fuck, i.e., consent, then his little dick wouldn't get hard, would it? See? That's biology. A young girl can fuck like a mink, enjoy it tremendously, then pretend that she didn't really want it, and no one is the wiser!! So the male goes to prison for 4,000 years, and she just goes off happy as a lark looking around for some other stupid male whose dick is hard! Baron Max
You apparently don't know enough about sexual biology. You could as well say that when someone humiliates a man by forcing him to masturbate, the fact that the man gets ejaculation --- and that ejaculation is a pleasant feeling, it means that the man liked it and so his consent is automatic. To get it up is not really all that difficult, especially at that young age and even when you don't desire the woman. Even if you hate your woman, you can get it up with a little prodding and stuff!
How can a male masturbate AND ejaculate if his dick ain't hard? And if his dick is hard, then what, biologically, does that mean??? Oh, really? Please cite some evidence of that for us ...I'd be interested in reading such new scientific evidence on the subject. Baron Max
It means that biologically a male's dick is so made that even someone he considers his sister, if she prods it enough can make him hard and cum (I know its disgusting, but I had to make you understand!). But it doesn't mean that he likes to have sex with his sister (or mother or whatever!), or that his consent is there. By the way, you could get an erection just sitting in a bus! Everything is not supported by studies. I think being a male should be enough to make you understand that. I am a counsellor and I have counselled any number of men who have sex with women even when they did not wanted to (I think more or less everyman goes through that!).
Well for me, age 10 is what, 5th grade? Yep, that's about the right age for me. I was sexually active in 5th and 6th grade. Mainly 6th grade as that's when all the girls were starting to develop and the hormones were kickin in. Before then, say 3rd and 4th grade, we were all playing "doctor" and I was dry-humping girls not knowing what to do, lol. But once those hormones kicked in and finally had a hard-on, now we all knew what was supposed to happen whereas before I was wondering how in the hell am I supposed to get this into that? Too bad Sex Ed didn't happen until the end of 6th grade when quite a few people in the class were already sexually active as it would have made us a bit more aware of the dangers of having sex. This is why I'm all for teaching it at a slightly younger age. Moms may be worried and call those schools bad names, but they're just ignorant mothers because I personally know from experience, that all of those things happen at a much younger age and nope, no way in hell did I ever tell my parents just as my mom thought I was an innocent angel too, yet wasn't. Kids learn things damned fast and they're much brighter than you may think. Generations improve and I wouldn't doubt that they're having sex as even younger ages now, especially in the time of Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Horny Rap Videos, Free Internet Porn, Webcams and all that. Oh yeah, I could get an erection sitting on a bus alright, but there'd have to be some good thoughts going through my head. However, I would NOT get an erection being surrounded by a bunch of older high school GUYS that are THREATENING me, even if I there may be girls I'm supposed to be masturbating to. My willie would shrivel up so bad like a turtle I'd get laughed at! And if I did happen to get a hard-on, as Baron Max mentioned, being around a bunch of older high school guys, that'd probably mean I was a homo. Not that there's anything wrong with that, in the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld. There's a lot more to getting a hard-on then just being rubbed. It's more mental than physical. Hell, I've been in situations where a girl has wanted to jump my bones but I just couldn't get it up. I just flat out wasn't attracted to her no matter how hard she tried (mainly cause she had an Amazon jungle between her legs which I find absolutely disgusting). It's not as easy as just having someone rub you, even if a sister as you mentioned. The only way that boy is gonna get hard by his sister rubbing him up, is if he's fantasizing about her. And that should tell you a lot just as the poor kid getting a hard-on in front of all those high school bullies. - N
You're wrong. Many male victims of child sexual abuse report feeling tremendously guilty that they got an erection or even ejaculated while being fondled by a pedophile. Erections are bodily reactions. Stimulate the penis, and it may become erect. There doesn't have to be any sexual desire involved.
Yeah, after the fact!! That's like the girls who fuck without any protection, then claim it was rape so they don't have to take/accept the responsibility for their stupid actions! Baron Max
Thanks GOD that atleast one another guy is still straight, I though the Homo memetic virus has left me alone in a zombie world. But the question is did someone told U to be hetro instead of homo ? Even if something did , what do U think is the right thing for a kid to ask to be , A homo or hetro ?
