'Extreme Pornography'

Isn't all sex "natural" regardless of how strange, sick or gross it may seem? It may not be normal or average, but it's still natural.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Having sex to procreate is natural. For some animals (like us), sex for pleasure is natural, as well.

However, by all standards, sex between strangers for the profit of the participants, and for the revenue of its distributors and marketers, is completely unnatural. So is the bestiality and incest pornography available on the Internet.


Kadark

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

All of that statement hinges on one concept ..."natural". It also hinges on the universal acceptance of your definition. I.e., if fuckin' a goat is "natural" for one person, isn't it natural for him?

By the same token, isn't the purchase and enjoyment of porno "natural"? If not, then there's just one helluva lot of UN-natural people in the world. Porno is multi-gazilion dollar industry ...how can you call it UN-natural?

Baron Max

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

They may only be a mouseclick away, but they are also illegal. If you were found with images of child pornography on your computer you could very easily land yourself in prison. That is not the point in question.

I think you have become a little confused: the OP was proposing a discussion on further dividing this term of 'extreme pornography' to make leeway for consenting adults. I think sex with children and animals is in a completely different league to 'horror-themed porn' with no actual harm. Yet, they both come under the same name in the eyes of the law.
A second point was that such images are seen as acceptable on the big screen in films such as the Saw series and Hostel. While images of the like are incriminating if downloaded from the internet. Up to speed, sir?

I see, and what do you suggest? Censorship of the internet?

 

personally i see nothing wrong with any of those!

(i have to admit though i find golden showers a BIG turn of)

 

Agree with Luci. None of those are wrong, because they are consensual.

Sure, you could argue that if one guy wants his dick cut off and fried to eat, so long as it's consensual, that's fine. But none of those behaviours described involve either injuring anyone or doing something irreversible to anyone. So I see nothing wrong with them.

 

"Unnatural" is a meaningless term and why should "unnatural" mean "illegal"?

 

The last clause worries me.

 

In which message?

 

Usually whats missing in erotica is a CONTEXT.

For example, if you paint a yellow dot on a canvas...its just a boring yellow dot.

But if you give it a context, with sky and clouds and a landscape...suddenly it becomes the sun.

 

Can you reconcile biting into a cheeseburger???

No consent there either!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Penguins and bonobos both have prostitution.

 

I saw a site where a woman's breast was put over a board and a nail hammered through it. I have to wonder how many willing non-drugged women are participating in extreme porn. How is this porn anyways??

 

UGH....

I have heard of gay men doing that with their penises...apparently a way of showing how tough you are...:bugeye:

 

LOL "As Lucifer said"

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Frida Kahlo is quoted as saying that the only unnatural sex act is one that you cannot perform. There is some truth to this of course as whatever you do would seem natural to you but I still think there can be psychological reasons why some acts that are deemed paraphilia become natural for an individual. I think ones sexuality can become perverse for these reasons.

 

james, have you ever watched an easter "cellibration" in the phillaphines? (they actually get nailed to crosses there, for real)

Anyway i agree to an extent. Child porn and beastality involves no consent. Necrophila is more troublesome because its concivable that either a) people are faking it (for instance by having one party lie in an ice bath and lay still) and b) its concivable that someone could donate there body for this purpose.

However S&M which is consentual EVEN if it involves physical injury should NOT be illegal for the same reasons piercings and tattoos arnt illegal. They involve consent.

 

why don't we just exterminate all the people who are so fucked up they can't even figure out sex?

 

Oh god don't stop there, I was just about to cum you tease.