Electron bonds

trevor borocz johnson

trevor borocz johnson

Registered Senior Member
The electron doesn't bond I think. They repel against the attraction of the nuclei's gravity. The heat that makes the electron seeks out colder regions of space/aether whatever you call it to expand into as it is free of the source it originated from. This quality of energy heat to be attracted to the cold causes the repulsion, neither electron is attracted to the heat of the other.
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
The electron doesn't bond I think. They repel against the attraction of the nuclei's gravity. The heat that makes the electron seeks out colder regions of space/aether whatever you call it to expand into as it is free of the source it originated from. This quality of energy heat to be attracted to the cold causes the repulsion, neither electron is attracted to the heat of the other.
Click to expand...
Word salad.

Take your meds, Trevor.
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
So in electrostatic theory the proton is a sink and the electron an inward flow that attracts the electron to the proton? What keeps them from colliding?
Click to expand...
Why doesn't the Earth collide with the Sun, due to the gravitational attraction between them?
 
Last edited:
exchemist said:
Why doesn't the Earth collide with the Sun, due to the gravitational attraction between them?
Click to expand...

I don't know. Hey exchemist before I get the permanent boot here I just thought I'd mention to our lightning discussion that lightning has been seen and recorded on Jupiter as well, so maybe there is more to consider there.
 
The atomic number of oxygen is eight, assuming that nuclei are round, 8 of them would create a perfect cube, this would make oxygen more stable in it's energy shells around the atom, and lack a common trait of atom's to be unstable in these regions and good conductors. Also iron is 26, one shy of a perfect 27 and is the densest strongest atom.

Notice how magnetism is a property to cubic numbers of 3 and 4 give or take a couple nuclei. A perfect cubic structure might line up the atoms so they act together and create a fan like magnetic effect. Could that be a clue to the electric potential of water?

"Magnetically hard materials are used to create permanent magnets made from alloys generally consisting of varying amounts of iron, aluminium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements samarium, dysprosium and neodymium."

What Materials Make Magnets | First4Magnets
https://www.first4magnets.com › magnetic-materials-i156









d rare earth elements samarium, dysprosium and neodymium.
 
If oxygen, which is a gas, has a strong magnetic field on its own, as strong as steel, but doesn't line up as easily because its a gas, that could explain why its so energy absorbing and exchanges energy readily during oxidation.
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
The atomic number of oxygen is eight, assuming that nuclei are round, 8 of them would create a perfect cube,
Click to expand...
Nope.
There is no such thing as Oxygen-8 (which is what would be required to make your perfect cube).
Oxygen-16 has 8 protons and 8 neutrons.
Oxygen-17 has 8 protons and 9 neutrons.
Oxygen-18 has 8 protons and 10 neutrons.

Please stop talking about stuff you know nothing about. Your posts serve only to accelerate global warming and the eventual heat death of the universe.
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
Nope.
There is no such thing as Oxygen-8 (which is what would be required to make your perfect cube).
Oxygen-16 has 8 protons and 8 neutrons.
Oxygen-17 has 8 protons and 9 neutrons.
Oxygen-18 has 8 protons and 10 neutrons.

Please stop talking about stuff you know nothing about. Your posts serve only to accelerate global warming and the eventual heat death of the universe.
Click to expand...
There is actually one glimmer of sanity in Trevor's rambling, which is that the ground state of O₂ is a triplet,( ³Σ⁻g), with 2 unpaired electrons in π* orbitals. This gives oxygen a magnetic moment, making it paramagnetic, that is, tending to be attracted into an external field, as it can reduce its potential energy by aligning the molecules with the field. So while it makes no sense to describe it as magnetic, it can be "magnetised", in a sense.

As with Beaconator, one has the sense that poor Trevor might have known some chemistry once, before the schizophrenia overwhelmed him.
 
Well I tried a little experiment to see if the cubic nature of the Oxygen in water could be alligned and then frozen into place. I froze a magnet in water and it did NOT align the water molecules in any magnetic form. However water has two atoms of hydrogen, its not pure oxygen, maybe frozen oxygen would behave differently.
 
exchemist said:
This gives oxygen a magnetic moment, making it paramagnetic, that is, tending to be attracted into an external field,
Click to expand...
Yes, but that was the given; we know oxygen is paramagnetic. Trevor maybe picked that up from Wiki and ran with it in his whimsical way.
 
The nucleus of non cubic atoms would have an electron shell that varies, in its weak state where the nuclei are loosely together it would have a positive charge of donuts. In it's strong state the electron would be highly energized and compress the nucleus into a spherical shape as best it can. My point is these atoms would take on and lose electron energy readily as opposed to those that are closer to being cubic in formation. The more cubic nucleus's are more resilient to their original state, why steel is leading elastic material, they make springs out of it, unlike copper which would make a poor spring.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, but that was the given; we know oxygen is paramagnetic. Trevor maybe picked that up from Wiki and ran with it in his whimsical way.
Click to expand...
He might, I suppose. It's the sort of thing a magnetism crank (and God knows, there are plenty of them about:rolleyes:) might latch onto.

Oh well, I suppose we've got better things to do than try to guess the mental processes of somebody mentally ill.
 
Actually I'm going to have to go back on something I said. Oxygen would have a weaker shell of electron energy because the nucleus is small and would therefore have a weak magnetic field. That might explain its weak paramagnetic effect. I wonder what would happen if you magnetized Oxygen as you froze it.

But the cubic numbers of 8, 27, and 64 have neighboring atoms that are all close to the same density and electronegativity within there respective groups.
 
Electronegativity is the only quality where the groupings of 8,27,64 and there neighboring numbers line up in the chart without overlapping each other. 7,8 and 9 are strongest then the grouping 26,27,28,and 29 are midly electronegative, and the group around 64 are least electronegative.

The three cubic groups also are in close range for melting and boiling points as well. https://www.lenntech.com/periodic-chart-elements/boiling-point.htm
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
Electronegativity is the only quality where the groupings of 8,27,64 and there neighboring numbers line up in the chart without overlapping each other.
Click to expand...
What chart?

Explain what you're talking about.

What are the numbers you're referring to?

The point of posting here is to communicate something to other people, isn't it? Otherwise, why bother?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top