As I see it, the paradox is really the complete inability of an observer to distinguish a singularity from nothing since both are defined as having no relative quality. The best definition is in being starkly opposite thus exisisting as opposed to not. So we represent the singularity by drawing a point, but actually it's the page, and the single dot represents a duality. :bugeye:
The page itself is a representation of possible location so potential precedes an event. Try to make a representation accurately presenting nothing and only emptiness, never nothing. With no relative there the observer says 'I' as opposed to the empty thing, and becuase the contrast is dual he is also opposite by definition, hence in the empty dark he is full of light, and also contains both as awareness of the disparity. :bugeye:
A location is not anything. That is why it can be occupied. Just like space/time is just a location - no page. What did you think nothing is?
The mind can say here is the singularity, yet there is no relative property, or here is nothing - ....... effectually it can't be know which is real, but one is absolute, which makes no difference, because they're indistinguishable. The perceiver is the instrument of discerment, and discernment is own choice, yet also the instrument of measure. We see Will as a power of choice or discernment of comparitive qualities.
