Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by nebel, Apr 30, 2018.
Resonance of what thing ?
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
I used the term in a colloquial sense. Matter in the solar system has for along time operated in related distances, velocities, ratios, of which the numbers that pop up, catching our attention are just the tip of the iceberg.
I leave the true, valuable science behind them to better minds. The last word on any of this has not been sai yet. we hear now about the gravitational wave background noise, , the vibration of strings at the other extreme end of the spectrum.
all good vibes.
Vibration , Rotation , Magnetic Fields , etc , together at the same moment , in our Solar System , would be an interesting picture . In 3D . 3D Video would be better .
The juxta-position upon themselves would be interesting .
Think of a Chladni plate, combined with a picture of ALMA rings image of early star/ planetary systems forming
Well lets See . nebel . The pictures , if not the video . In 3D .
This thread is about numbers of Nr 1, the first planet to be confirmed to have life. like it
having 10 times more weeks than the exact distance to the big dominator among the planets 1: 5,2 or if you prefer the bode sequence numbers 10: 52 or light seconds in Orbit diameter: 1 000 : 5 2oo. 10 m/s^2 gravity, 1/10 ooo. of c as orbital velocity, a 10 meter equivalent of atmospheric pressure, 10 digits, so,
river, if you like pretty pictures about resonances, go to images of chladni plates., ALMA protoplanetary fields. please.
The link nebel , for the images of chladni plates . I'm sure there are more than me that what to see these images , video .
Now in English , words . Describe in words what you are saying mathematically .
of course, but you are on the wrong thread , go to: " planets orbit like stars vibrate." please.
chladni plate images are on google. copyright issues make it hard to reproduce them here foe you all. enjoy.
I could say it in german, or French if you like, each with their own charm and precision, but as
I said here before,
the many numbers and ratios associated with planet No 1, 0r bode 10 are worth noting. They are obviously the result of the outworkings of laws and energy levels set in motion at the Big Bang. from energy that is uncreated.
Ah...BB , at the big bang . From energy that is uncreated .
Now make more sense .
well, the great Isaac Newton said that for this to fall into place like that (not in these numbers), but the planetary relationships, There had to be tinkering , nudging once in a while.
River, it was just the flow of things, the set up, outworking of the laws. power, genius beyond our grasp.
It might not even have been planned that way, but that is how it turned out. perhaps just our imagination. by the numbers.
Proved by the physical , if true .
The numbers. physically are true, what you make of it, is up to you.
What would Newton do today ? Think today ?
first: check his predictions with findings of modern science. such as instant propagation of gravity changes with qm's entanglement. compare his alchemy trials with our nuclear fission, fusion.
second: have a try at marital bliss. what a miss.
What have you found ?
I was comparing the numbers of No.1. the Earth, embedded in Mercury to Pluto, looked at
178 TOI. and while we live in a geometric series with a lower limit of .3 AU, and upper limit of 9.6 AU.,
TOI 178, like most exoplanet systems, has no such single clear pattern. There are 4 doubling in the orbits there, none including planet e. Earth has 6 doublings, all in series.
Those spacing ratios show in the amazing orbit resonances. but it is 178, not No. 2
In English Nebel . Please .
You are lucky you do not have to read in french or german , but here it goes:
The thread is about the correlation between stellar pulsations and the spacing of planets.
A model is proposed, whereby gravity or magnetic pulses from the star or planets , that travel at the speed of light "c" maintain or created a standing wave pattern, in which the planets formed and still orbit.
The evidence of this is facilitated by the coincidence, that the orbit diameter of the Earth, N0. 1, is
~ 1000 light seconds at "c". from that follows, that
the minimum planetary diameter difference is ~300 light seconds, corresponding to the 5 minut solar pulsation, the maximum outer gap, , 9,6 AU = the 160 minutes solar vibration,
Is this unique, or do other star-planet systems follow the pattern?
using the numbers from
List of exoplanets discovered in 2021
the orbit radii for TOI 178 b, @ ,02607, c @ .0370, d @ .092 AU, e @ .0783, f @ .1039, g @ .1275
In the layout, since the values are in AU= 1000 light seconds, it turned out that the smallest gap in diameters is ~.011 AU or 11 light sec. (the distance between planets b and c or b-g : 9
The largest, so far is from a-b or e to f. or a-g : 5 ~ .026 AU, or 26 light seconds.
Life here is on a 1000 light second diameter orbit, there, at TOI 178 it would be possible @ 200.
No1 and it's numbers are unique.
Around what was the standing wave , standing .
Separate names with a comma.