But you're not rejecting irrational claims. You're rejecting perfectly rational ones, and doing so on the basis of your faith. This is why you keep moving the goalposts from "reasonable doubt" to "proof" whenever the point reaches home. You're clearly uncomfortable with the idea that your god can be shown to be a fabrication, so again I have to wonder why you want to have this discussion. Of course, even as I ask that, the answer becomes clear: You simply want to dismiss these points. This is a self-affirming exercise for you. Well, congratulations on not being a fundamentalist, I guess? I don't know why you want applause for being a relatively peaceable closed-minded theist.