Death to Apostates (?)

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by James R, Aug 2, 2008.

?

Death to apostates?

  1. I am Christian or Jewish. Apostates should be killed.

    1 vote(s)
    2.6%
  2. I am Christian or Jewish. Apostates should not be killed.

    7 vote(s)
    18.4%
  3. I am Muslim. Apostates should be killed.

    2 vote(s)
    5.3%
  4. I am Muslim. Apostates should not be killed.

    1 vote(s)
    2.6%
  5. I am a member of some other religion. Apostates from my religion should be killed.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. I am a member of some other religion. Apostates should not be killed.

    5 vote(s)
    13.2%
  7. I am non-religious. People who become religious should be killed.

    2 vote(s)
    5.3%
  8. I am non-religious. People who become religious should not be killed.

    18 vote(s)
    47.4%
  9. No opinion / don't want to vote / other (explained below)

    2 vote(s)
    5.3%
  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    They'd have to manually kill each and every one.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    No reply to #180 Sam? Need to brew up some more lies to spurt out as an answer?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Its your logic, you figure it out. Scientifically, it takes only one falsification to disprove a hypothesis and I already gave several :shrug:
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    None that apply. You need to dispense with my NOT argument before they do.

    You suck at debate, you really do.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    There is no debate

    Ho : religion = violence
    Ha : atheism = violent genocidal dictators

    Ho is false
     
  9. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    SAM, I am not sure i understaND that.
     
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    SAM are you ok ?
     
  11. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    John... remove that avatar this instant !

    You fooled me twice now

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    ha ha ha. i fooled myself too. have you answered any posts thinking it was you know who?

    Edit: nevermind i just seen it.
     
  13. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Yes.. the above one.. lol

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    :bravo:
     
  15. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
  16. greenberg until the end of the world Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,811
    Speaking as an in-effect atheist, there is something that really bothers me about some theists: that they don't seem to take their religion seriously.

    I do not think that once one has publicly declared to know God, one is free to redefine one's religious attitudes.
    Declaring knowledge of God is, in my estimation, a matter so serious that after that, one cannot redefine one's attitudes and excuse oneself with "oh, I'm simply human, I am free to change my mind and rightfully expect to be forgiven".

    Someone who has publicly declared knowledge of God should not expect to get away with saying "caveat emptor".
    Publicly declaring knowledge of God should be considered as coming with a great responsiblity towards all those people who seek God.

    People who publicly declare knowledge of God and then change their mind, or who claim to know God yet behave promiscuously or otherwise inappropriately, should be punished. They should not be free to "get away with it".

    Surely a listener has responsibility to be careful about whom and what he believes. But the listener's responsibility does not absolve the speaker.
     
  17. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Well, I think we're done here. I'm encouraged to learn that of all the voters here, only one is in favour of killing apostates. And of course, that person is too cowardly to put his name to his opinion.
     
  18. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    That would probably be DiamondHearts. Although he's openly admitted it before.

    I hate to ask this - and I know the haters won't believe that I hate to do so, but there it is - but why did almost none of the forum's muslims respond?
     
  19. DiamondHearts Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,557
    I didn't vote.

    If Moderators can see who voted, they will know.

    Is there anyway Moderators can punish a member for libel?
     
  20. DiamondHearts Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,557
    I'm really tired of you GeoffP.

    Moderators, is there any rule about a member who stalks each and every one of your posts to make you look bad?

    A member who takes every opportunity available to misrepresent your views.

    If there is anyone has questions about my views, they can PM me directly.

    When it comes to my views, please do not listen to Geoff. He is a hate-monger.
     
  21. Sock puppet path GRRRRRRRRRRRR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,112
    It's kind of obvious isn't it

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. DiamondHearts Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,557
    No, I don't believe that.
     
  23. Sock puppet path GRRRRRRRRRRRR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,112
    Should apostates be killed Diamond?

    Or, Why didn't you simply vote no?
     

Share This Page