copyright image theft (re. spuriousmonkey)

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by perplexity, Sep 18, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. perplexity Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,179
    You don't know what you are talking about.

    My wife knows what I look like.
    She took the photo.

    --- Ron.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. kazakhan Registered Abuser Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    915
    You said he stole it. I see you're still using it. Intellectual property laws are indeed well defined so why are you claiming spurious stole your image? It's infringement not theft.
    In other words you'd prefer to throw a public tantrum...
    Can you see my avatar Ron? If so block it and stop infringing my copyright.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    Your alledged wife is then the owner of the picture.

    duh...

    Shame she doesn't exist because the observer is not objective.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. perplexity Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,179
    She supports my claim, not yours.

    --- Ron.
     
  8. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    Okiedokie. I can't wait till the police arrives to knock on my door.


    I hope you have evidence!
     
  9. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    thedevilinside would always tell ron to shut up.
    i often wondered why.
    now i know.
     
  10. imaplanck. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,237
    Ron so has a point here.
     
  11. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    wow!

    I did it again...


    stole your picure...


    again!!!
     
  12. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    notice that is specifically says: EXCLUSIVE PUBLICATION, PRODUCTION, SALE, OR DISTRIBUTION.

    you posted the picture on the internet, and by that very action (without before obtaining legal rights to the picture), you have willingly relinquished your right to say that your mug is copyrighted.

    a copyright is a tool of law to keep others from profiting from your intellectual properties. as a digital photo used as an avatar on a public, free of charge online forum, you have no claim.

    but please, i welcome you to threaten me the way you threatened invert nexus.
    fucking crybaby.
     
  13. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    careful ron that dutchman will stick his finger in your dyke.
    HAHAHAHA
     
  14. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    hey i'll steal it too!
     
  15. perplexity Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,179
    "copyright theft" is a commonly used phrase to describe the practice:

    http://www.google.com/search?as_qdr=all&q= "copyright theft

    Shame on you for your ingratitude, in view of the obvious ignorance of the subject.

    --- Ron.
     
  16. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    Ron, the image is hosted on David Watanabe's server, and there is only one copyright notice. Now, while all material is granted unofficial copyright status, hosting on some sites confers copyright to the site, or makes the work public domain. (deviantart, for example of the latter).

    I don't recall if there is anything specific about the copyright of avatars, or copyright in general in the sign up blurb.

    I'm not defending Spurious, just pointing out that it's not clear cut.
     
  17. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    When an american does it it is called bringing freedom.
     
  18. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    shut up, ron.

    like my avatar?
    sue me. sounds like fun!
     
  19. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    is imaplancks avatar allowed then?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    actually, it is.

    having published studies in 3 different scholastic publications, i know a bit about copyright law.

    you just cant stand being wrong.
    again, i state: shut up, ron. you are a fucking crybaby.
     
  21. perplexity Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,179
    That is simply not true.


    Copyright laws grant the creator the exclusive right to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute, perform and display the work publicly. Exclusive means only the creator of such work, not anybody who has access to it and decides to grab it.

    Copyright protection begins when any of the above described work is actually created and fixed in a tangible form.

    http://www.whatiscopyright.org/

    --- Ron.
     
  22. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    whatever helps you feel better about yourself, guy.

    hey look! now I am calling myself Ron Harvey!!
    does that mean that i have copyrighted my tagline? wow...didnt know it was so easy!

    get an education, simpleton.
     
  23. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    there is a difference between artists and plebs like you.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page