Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by James R, Sep 4, 2010.
And another evasion.
You are as dishonourable as you are ignorant.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
I cannot respond to anything pertaining that thread. As such, i have not looked at it...it is dead to me.
Lie. You spent ~1/2 hour after I'd posted that diagram (after you were banned) reading posts.
And there's nothing to prevent you looking at it.
How do you know?
I already said "I am not going to even go near that thread". I was warned to stay away from threads like that. And now you want to get me back into it? Forget it.
Um maybe it was the secret CIA report I commissioned. Maybe it was my hyper-stealthy spy-sat sat over your house.
Or, just possibly - this a wild guess - the fact that after your ban you were listed on the "Who's On Line" page as "John99 viewing that thread".
Take your pick.
You're a waste of skin. Someone could have maybe made an acceptable human being out of the materials.
Well that was wrong.
You think i'm stupid?
You dont tug on supermans cape.
...or maybe...you are James.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Looking at the Who's On Line page is wrong?
Not at all.
I know you are.
Does that mean anything in the real world?
It must have been stuck. I was blocked as soon as James dropped the axe.
there is no count on the quantity of eggs hidden..
if we knew there were 50 eggs stashed in 100 box's then it would be 50% chance of finding an egg in each box..
since we do not know how many eggs there are in total, how can we calculate a percentage?
wow could you do that by PM please
PS it was a stupid thing to say John99 and you aren't improving
Here is some homework
... I think I'm going to have eggs for dinner ...NMSquirrel their really isn't 50% change unless it's a given
play a bid with this please
I cant respond to anything pertaining to the tides. If james says it is ok then i will give my responses. James shut me down, he told me i would be banned.
I don't believe that James intended this to be a "trick" question based on the semantics of a partial sentence segment. It is simply a variation on the "marbles in a bag" problem taught in basic statistic classes. Pre-university level, I might add. The classic problem is:
A bag of marbles exists such that it contains exactly 100 marbles, colored black or white and only black or white. The marbles are inserted in the bag randomly as to color. 10 marbles are withdrawn and inspected, whereby 1 is found to be black in color. How many black marbles remain in the bag?
Do you like that better?
If someone says they "may or may not" there is no alternative than for me to conclude there is 50% chance for one box and 50% chance for 100 boxes. The number of boxes is irrelevant.
If someone posts the things you do there is no alternative than for me to declare a 50% chance that I will be able to resist responding to your idiocy in the future.
Are you saying that i am wrong?
Indubitably, undoubtedly, fer sure dude - wrong...
How can that be wrong?
Separate names with a comma.