Can retrocausality save us from non-locality?

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by arfa brane, May 25, 2021.

  1. arfa brane call me arf Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,184
    The bartender says,"Same again?"

    Two retrocausal particles go into a bar.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,618
    why is the bar tender not a particle ?

    "The Particle Tender" says "make mine a thruple divisive of none"
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,618
    If the two retrocausal particles then get pissed, we are talking exciting new physics. Other than that, shouldn't the thread title be
    'Can retrocausality save us from explain non-locality'
    That is - how does retrocausalty not automatically imply nonlocality? Unless one is happy with 'contextual/many-worlds' interpretations?
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2021
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page