Can penis size be too large?

See post.


  • Total voters
    12
Status
Not open for further replies.
imaplanck. said:
It's a thread to test whether the compulsion to have a massive penis is purely a male ego thing or whether it is truely driven by female demand.
there's a thread in the cesspool that discusses this very topic.
 
leopold99 said:
"can penis size be too large?"
this has to be the lamest damn question ever asked on this board.
You have to be the dumbest person on the board!
Jesus, Can no one understand the point of this. How the fuck can you get an infinate sized dick?
Read the damn thing again! this time try and get the context.
 
leopold99 said:
there's a thread in the cesspool that discusses this very topic.
No it does't spaz. It merely asks what size penis people here have, it never addresses whether there can be an upper limit in desirability from a femal point of view.
 
Its very simple guys, youraplank wishes to know what we girlies think is 'enough'.

Which means you boys have no place in this thread.

Now then youraplank, it really depends on the female you are having sex with , if she is big and baggy she will require more girth and length, if she is small and tight, less girth and less length required. This is something you cannot guage by 'looking ' at a female, and you are not permitted to ask, thus you just read up on foreplay techniques and hope that when the intercourse takes place, it is merely a fine end to an already perfect evening.
 
Theoryofrelativity said:
Its very simple guys, youraplank wishes to know what we girlies think is 'enough'.

.
Bingo! but it is also asking if too much can actually be unarousing, we alll know too small can, but it is rarely(if ever) asked if too big can be so.
 
imaplanck. said:
Bingo! but it is also asking if too much can actually be unarousing, we alll know too small can, but it is rarely(if ever) asked if too big can be so.


It's not unarousing unless it hurts, in which case the pain masks any pleasure. Certain positions are painful and thus avoided, bleeding can occur.
Its always nice to look at a nice big cock though. Though there is a limit, I suppose anything abnormal looking would be off putting, say 10 inches maximum for looks.

7.5+ inches can be too large for many girls re certain positions so guys should not desire more if they already have that.

Small is not a turn off unless the guy is unimaginative. It does not hurt
and can be compensated for in other ways, extra sensory pleasure can be given with ad ons if neccessary.
 
Last edited:
Theoryofrelativity said:
it's not unarousing unless it hurts, in which case the pain masks any pleasure

small is better than large in this regard and 8 inches can be too large for many girls.

Small can be compensated for in other ways and certainly small does not inflict pain so small does not reduce any pre-existing pleasure, pleasure can be given with ad ons if neccessary.
Yeah you've nearly got my point, but not quite. :D
OK when a woman sees an erect penis she gets aroused yeah?(I know it's definately not the only factor for arousal but none the less it is a factor , hence tiny dicks are a turnoff yeah?) So what I am asking(putting thoughts of possible pain aside) is - Is there sort of an ideal size(a smaller size than "as big as you can get pal") in terms of what females are aroused by.
OK I might PM you an example and ask you your opinion.
 
imaplanck. said:
Yeah you've nearly got my point, but not quite. :D
OK when a woman shes an erect penis she gets aroused yeah?(I know it's definately not the only factor for arousal but none the less it is a factor for arousal, hense tiny dicks are a turnoff yeah?) So what I am asking(putting thoughts of possible pain aside) is - Is the sort of an ideal size in terms of what females are aroused by.
OK I might PM you an example and ask you your opinion.

read my edit

Also, please do not cry BUT

MOST women do not like the look of a cock at all, erect or soft, so size is irrelevant.

I am in the minority in that I do find their appearance arousing but many women do not. Hence complete absence of male nudie mags for females.
 
Last edited:
spuriousmonkey said:
Can a penis be too miniscule?

I once had the misfortune to come across something that felt rather like my little finger. I was too afraid to look, incase I laughed, or grimaced or something worse....maybe cry?

Anyway, he had long term girls so obviously they weren't all as picky picky as me. I had to make my excuses and remain 'friends'.
 
The largest erect member in medical literature would be the 14-inch organ mentioned by Dr. David Reuben in his book Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (1969). Reuben didn’t divulge any source for this figure, and there was no independent verification, so you may question his accuracy. The largest medically verified penis on record is 13.5 inches long and 6.25 inches around, documented in the early twentieth century by Dr. Robert L. Dickinson. Other sources (Alfred Kinsey, Masters and Johnson, etc.) mention specimens ranging from 9.5 to 12 inches.

13.5 inch. that isn't too bad. Or i mean nothing compared to a whale.
 
imaplanck. said:
This is a thread about big dicks, I didn't actually think one would write in it...............
Im talking about an upper limit in terms of what is desirable, are you retarded?
It's a thread to test whether the compulsion to have a massive penis is purely a male ego thing or whether it is truely driven by female demand.
Then maybe your question should have been "what size penis is too much for a women?" That seems to be at the heart of what you're trying to commincate. Think before you type, monogloid.

"There is no such thing as a stupid question" = proved wrong by this thread.
 
francois said:
Then maybe your question should have been "what size penis is too much for a women?" That seems to be at the heart of your question.

"There is no such thing as a stupid question" = proved wrong by this thread.

I understood the question, perhaps it is you who is at fault.
 
Theoryofrelativity said:
I understood the question, perhaps it is you who is at fault.
My point, ToR, is that it's extremely obvious that a penis can be too large. Is that not self-evident? My point is that the question shouldn't be "is it possible for a penis to be too large;" it should be, "how big is too big?" The question has an obvious answer, hence the unanimity of the responses. So it's a worthless question.
 
francois said:
Then maybe your question should have been "what size penis is too much for a women?" That seems to be at the heart of what you're trying to commincate. Think before you type, monogloid.

"There is no such thing as a stupid question" = proved wrong by this thread.
I took it as an assumption that everyone here was over a certain age of sexual muturity and therefor there was no need to draw a diagram :rolleyes: , obviously I was wrong dip shit!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top