Blacks Less Intelligent Than Whites?

Well, it's like many kinds of research ...often we don't know something unless we study it. And there are many scientific advances that have come from studying something else entirely - happy little accidents.

If we study blacks, we might find out why all blacks have huge cocks, then we can splice that gene onto the genes of the whites, and ...voila'... the whites can have big, giant cocks, too!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Baron Max

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's terrible!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So you met a few people and talked to them, then concluded that all such people are equally intelligent with all other people? Hmm, I'm not sure, but I think scientific research is done a little differently.

Perhaps you could submit your findings to some university and see what they say?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Baron Max

 

It's terrible to have a big dick? Or it's terrible to want one? Duh?

Baron Max

 

spare us your homoerotic fantasies.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Would it be racist to do a study on the miserliness of the Scots?

Any study aimed at proving a preconceived point rather than finding the truth is obviously unscientific.

 

Both.
1. Because such higher testosterone levels increase violent behaviour.
2. It means you have a pornographic mind.

 

Okay, I've always thought that the black kinky hair that blacks have would be so much easier to take care of. So, ...if the research uncover a "kinky-hair gene", then anyone who wants black kinky hair can have it. Pretty neat, huh?

Baron Max

 

No, it wouldn't be racist ...or even discriminatory... if that's what some scientist wants to study.

Why? If the results were scientific, then regardless of what the researcher was trying to prove, it might prove just the opposite. What's unscientific about trying to find the reasons for intelligence?

Baron Max

 

So now you're wanting to use IQ in order to slander me .....but you refuse to use IQ scores to show that blacks are less intelligent than whites? ....LOL!

See? You're just like all the others ....you believe what you believe, and you won't accept anything that says otherwise.

Baron Max

 

Yep, that's what the researchers used to say about the blacks ....until the liberal, doo-gooders wouldn't let them release their scientific data showing that blacks were less intelligent than whites!

And now, of course, we have ghetto language that seems to prove all of the research of the last decades!

Baron Max

Infraction for trolling; racist comment on language-SAM

 

Please use the proper forum or PM for discussing infractions.

Off topic posts removed

 

You are joking right? About the 20 poorest countries in the world are in Africa. The GNP of India is more favorable than these 20 countries. When you look at these countries you notice that people barely hear about them outside this list, which is why patronization plays a big part of development. Some people think that they are underdeveloped because of some genetic effects on their intelligence but this is not true for the society on a whole. Roman empire became developed because it invited all the artists and engineers from the world over, so did Greece, Egypt, and every other developed civilization. There was also a time when developed countries were undeveloped, and there has always been times when some states were more developed than others. Undeveloped countries have been through numerous civil conflicts, corruption, excessive lending. Some of these countries even seem to still be in the formative stages at times, and the developments from other developed countries doesn't excatly follow as a confidence boster. More than 50% of intelligence is enviromental, the rest is the will of the Gods.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0908763.html

 

That's not true. People who live in heavily malarial zones have increased risk of sickle cell - many of these people are not "black", and the mutations involved seem to have happened on the Arabian peninsula and India before they happened in Africa. Black people in several areas of the world have no increased incidence of diabetes or glaucoma. None of those correlate mechanistically with skin color - which is the basic determiner of "race".

It's not that blacks have darker skin (that's not strictly true, either, btw), it's that those with darker skin are labeled "black". If you labeled those with glaucoma "black" you'd have the same correlation.

Sickle cell correlates mechanistically with malaria exposure, not race, as far as anyone knows. Scores on intelligence tests correlate with lead exposure and other cultural factors, not race, as far as anyone knows. There is no scientifically defined "black race" to correlate with, in fact.

Because they keep drawing ridiculous conclusions aligned with their prior agendas from the BS they insist on, they continually demonstrate bad motives for inventing or exaggerating such variance, and in the case of "intelligence" they have gone so far as to invent the trait in the first place.

How would you respond to someone who asserted that people with curly hair were members of a less intelligent race, and dismissal of that as nonsense showed some kind of political bias ?

 

You have this habit of making statements out of some parallel earth fantasy land. "There's no such thing as intelligence, there's no such thing as race...."

Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it true. What is it that allows humans to put a man on the moon and unlock the secrets of the universe while cows chew their cud oblivious to it all? What allows one man to become a doctor or lawyer, while another with Down's syndrome is lucky to hold a job bagging groceries?

Intelligence is the defining characteristic of humans, yet you claim it doesn't exist?