Black Holes A Opposed To The Big Bang

My prediction is that Solution of this Black hole Puzzle does not lie in any Quantum Gravity theory, the solution does not lie anywhere near r = 0 or anywhere near Planck's level....It lies at a much bigger dimension, hopelessly simple and obvious........

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why is it so difficult for you even to visualize and comprehend !!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Your prediction is nonsensical and fails scrutiny since it contravenes GR.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because it was befuddled thinking.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Reality never contravenes anything !!

 

Agreed...... It's a pity that you are totally blinded to it by your inflated ego problem and delusions.

 

Let me maintain my cool.....

If geodesic end at r = 0 of one Black Hole, then what would end at r = 0 of another Black Hole ??

[Don't stretch your mind, you will not get the answer, because the original statement that geodesic ends at r = 0 itself is vague and incorrect by your friend.]

 

I don't need to stretch my mind.
The statement obviously refers to geodesics inside BHs and where they are predicted to lead.
Most though believe r=0 will not be reached, rather a surface of sorts at below the quantum/Planck level and above r=0, which you have been told a hundred times.
And obviously we will never have any observational verification of it, although a future validated QGT will infer logical solutions.

 

Thanks! I almost forgot to laugh at about something today.

 

Rajesh, you get that almost all of the solutions in the discussion only involve one black hole and even just one gravitational field.

 

Did you stop to think about my analogy comparing r=0 zero to sea level?

Yes everyone agrees point singularities don't exist. Stop and think!

 

You don't get the bigger picture, Paddoboy of course cannot get, unless he is told and drawn into....

Geodesic is about spacetime, not about any matter.......,,when you say that geodesic ends at r = 0, then it would have originated somewhere, where ?

Moreover if there are say multiple BHs (which we are claiming that they are) then geodesic would end at r = 0 of every BH, which geodesic ?? Please see your EFE and tell us how you can make multiple geodesics end at r = 0 of multiple BHs.............

As I said earlier, relativity may be a fine theory, but it is screwed up by the ignorance and the quackery of those who claim to swear by it.

 

Can you think about what I said below (Post # 181).....it is much higher than probably your sea level...

.......My prediction is that Solution of this Black hole Puzzle does not lie in any Quantum Gravity theory, the solution does not lie anywhere near r = 0 or anywhere near Planck's level....It lies at a much bigger dimension, hopelessly simple and obvious........

 

Use your brain for something other than a cushion. If you fall into the black hole your path ends at r=0. All paths inside the black hole lead to r=0 for the Schwarzschild geometry. All the possible paths cover the shortest possible distance and the least proper time and terminate at the limit r=0. Rajesh, please do a little research so that you have a chance of making sense. You should consider doing that and then beginning in a different forum where you won't be immediately viewed as an idiot wind.

 

You have said much, and much that makes little or no sense.

What you have said has already been invalidated by most on this forum and a handful of Professors. You are pissing into the wind

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

If you dig a tunnel to the center of the earth, and throw a stone, it will go to r = 0 of the Earth, does it mean that geodesic has ended at r = 0.

Even if we go by maths, inside EH (from EH to r = 0), the time becomes spatial (position like), so it is meaningless to say that geodesic ends at r = 0.........why don't you teach about asymptotes etc to your blind followers...they just follow your words as gospel truth, however stupid those words may be..

 

Why you don't keep the gap between XXXX and the sink (commode) ?

PS : Just for laugh, no obscenity meant...

 

So, no problem deeply philosophising about issues that are intrinsically high-end specialist maths intensive, but cannot bring yourself to meaningfully deal with imo a basic physics 101 gaffe, as again asked to do, in #159? I could cite maybe a score or more of cases where various members have similarly failed to either defend or concede when challenged on an issue. Just go to ground till it all gets forgotten. A rampant sickness here at SF. How about bucking that pattern just this once!

 

The center of the Earth is not a BH, which makes your analogy invalid.

According to our theories, r=0 is where geodesics finish.
We don't believe things will go that far though. When I say "we" I mean normal average people not befuddled in their way of thining, and not blinded by inflated egos.

ps; Maybe we should all follow your gospel truth?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Wow, how unscientific would that be!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

OnlyMe, this post of Paddoboy should give you a reason to laugh....