My position is very clear.. This is what I say.. (detailed explanation in my post # 227) "Planck level is not at all singularity, Neither we can associate singularity with Planck level." Paddoboy agrees to below statement when specifically questioned ........we cannot associated any length to the singularity..... But he does not agree to my statement in blue color...he calls that as incorrect....How ?? That mean he is associating Planck's Length with singularity......That is his understanding which has no physical basis..... I re iterate (as stated before) that EH provides a kind of shroud to BH singularity...no singularity can interact with Physical world.....BH singularity is not at all associated with Planck's scale.. Few scientists have hypothesized (again as stated in my posts earlier) that once inside EH the entire mass goes to Planck's level, if we accept this hypothesis then singularity vanishes.....Under no circumstances whatsoever scientifically any singularity can be attached with Planck's level (see my post #227).....This gentleman is thoroughly confused with QGT at Planck's level and failure of Relativity at that level due to singularity and thus mixing up singularity with Planck's level.... It is clear that inside EH the time in Schwarzschild metric becomes spatial....so how do you reach position coordinate of the level of Planck's scale ?? If you cannot reach then how can you associate Singularity with Planck's level ? And if at all you associate it with Plankc's level then where is the singularity ?? It becomes precise defined case as pursued by few scientists as referred above. These are difficult questions for him...Did you see the Paddoboy response to Professor's quote in his other cross referred thread....the self boasting, quite laughable.