No, Tach. Rash and premature claims and opinions, as ever, hey? The further development of my discussion with Grumpy in this thread will depend on the outcome and mutual understandings we reach in the other thread. Why persist in trying to claim falsely and 'verbal' and pre-empt things just because you have already made 'pre-conclusions' based only on what you 'know' but do not yet understand because you're missing the context and subtleties which an actual polite and proper discussion should eventually reveal if allowed to go to its natural conclusion based on the discussion points themselves, and not on your 'dictation' of what will and will not eventuate. Is that why you can't let people discuss in peace? Because you don't want to know what will come of a proper discussion on the issues and points only, and not your politics and malice aforethought loaded dictates? Stick to the math threads/discussions, and leave these things alone, Tach. Else you will only make a proper fool of yourself once more, and the admin/mods will have to give you a 'time out' in the naughty corner again, like they did before more than once because of these silly trolls and baits of yours. You are not inerrant keeper of orthodoxy, Tach; only a self-appointed nuisance who has a talent for maths....and nothing else, especially English language communications and physical scenario understandings IN CONTEX. Leave such things to the adults, since you are not quite there with those things yet, ok? Thanks and good luck.