Michael started a thread about the Clinton's here: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/hillary-clinton-the-next-potus.152413/#post-3321534 The thread in question has been locked and cesspooled. Michael has been issued a warning for 'lying'. I don't see any lies in the thread he started. Indeed, he cited a reputable news source to back up his claim about Hilary. Likewise, Bill Clinton's sexual escapades are public knowledge. The moderator who issued the warning labelled it a 'paranoid rant', which says far more about the biases of the individual moderating than Michael. Can the moderation team please clarify whether left-wing politicians are immune from criticism on this forum, and whether posting anything negative about these 'paragons' is against the rules? Because it's rather disingenuous to moderate these forums with a blatant left-leaning bias without first putting such information in the rules at sign-up. After all, you'd think a science forum would be politically neutral.