Apollo 11 press confrence*** I smell a hoax***!

they did. remember the roll of aluminum foil?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Hey Leopold, I've been very busy of late.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

doing who, er, what?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Faking the Mars landing.

 

That's absurd, if they used an actor instead of decorated airforce pilot the the hoax wouldn't of been credible at all. He's acting just like the typical Machurian candidate!

 

Writing a script and putting together a film crew for next springs faked landing on Mars......Oh Shit!!!!...I just let the cat out of the bag didn't I?....

 

No they didn't, if they did why would they have to repeat it?

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08sep_radioactivemoon.htm

 

who paid off the 10s of 1000s that worked on the project to keep their mouth shut?

 

Even cheaper with some acting coaching then isn't it....I mean really all that effort to do such a professional hoax and then just not bothering with the finishing touches?

 

So basicly what Nasa is saying is, they don't know the radiation levels on the moon. Therefore, theyr'e developing a probe that can retrieve that data. I find it very hard to believe that NASA would send men to the moon without even knowing the radiation levels on the moon. Nothing is survining outside of Earths magnetosphere, especially with 1960's technology.

 

uh, to get a more accurate sampling?

 

How come they didn't measure the radiation levels? Please link your sources.

 

that's what the article you posted said isn't it? /sarcasm

NO ONE has ever said the moon landing was faked on their deathbed.

 

Okay, so you agree with me that we had no accurate data regarding the moons radiation levels before we deployed the astronauts right?

 

http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/holearth.html

 

yes, i will agree that 1.1 is more accurate than 1

 

Perhaps they were sitting on 100 tons of dynamite programmed to go off if they muttered a single sentence exposing the hoax. They only just made it out alive.....

 

Blustering conjecture signafies a weak argument, and a lack of emprical evidence to support your position.

 

Out in deep space, radiation comes from all directions. On the Moon, you might expect the ground, at least, to provide some relief, with the solid body of the Moon blocking radiation from below. Not so.

When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface, they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08sep_radioactivemoon.htm

 

look homeboy the russians flew the luna probes around the moon taking pictures, i'm sure if they could pummle our as they would.

who paid off the contractors?
why no deathbed statements?