Any people with real psychic/paraphysical abilities here?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Crunchy Cat, Oct 13, 2002.

  1. Bebelina Feminazi Messiah Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,997
    No, that's called bragging.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. blackfoundations Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    94
    No, it's called real.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,746
    That you was gonna shut up.!!! :wallbang:
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Bebelina Feminazi Messiah Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,997
    I never said that.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    also think that the ESP detection must be part of the visceral system of the body (just a guess)
     
  9. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    or ... Parasympathetic nervous system...maybe...

    [instinctive / intuitive autonomic awareness ]

    You have heard of instinctive intelligence too I guess...? [ intelligence that operates in the background instinctively and devoted to orderly functioning of our Parasympathetic reactions ]
     
  10. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    This side of the subject is totally new to me. I'm interested to learn more. Is there related magazine articles perhaps?
     
  11. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    None specifically as it has never been given much thought.
    I started a thread ages ago that dealt with the possibility of defining God as an instinctive intelligence..[ non-sentient].[in philosophy ] I 'll see if I can dig it out of archives.
     
  12. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
  13. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
  14. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    Thanks for the links QQ. Do you believe in a 'connective dimension' between all people? It's not something I'm a great believer in though.
     
  15. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    belief would be incorrect, as know would be more precise.
    The interconnectedness you talk of is a universal constant and part of the universal constant. The same one that generates exact constancy of gravity, inertia and a few other rather mundane things...
    Every piece of matter in this universe including organic matter is entangled universally. [ quantum entanglement describes the process rather well I tend to think.]
    It provides a confirmation feedback loop that allows us a sense of objectivity or shared experience of this universe, as it too experiences us.
    some people call it GOD scientists call it entanglement, me? I don't care what it's called but it what ever you call it, knows everything about everything. omniscience and then provides the instinctive intelligence the objective information it needs to function.
    check out this thread:
    Objectivity and how it can be acheived - a robot analogy
    it is all part of a book yet to be published if I get the time to complete it: "The physics of God"
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2009
  16. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Moderator

    Messages:
    6,697
    Utter nonsense. You are simply dropping the buzzword 'entanglement' and saying you you think it's 'rather good' when you know nothing about it.

    If you don't care what it's called, why you do you lie about what scientists call it?

    I hope to hell you aren't married or have children because if you pay to get your book self published you'll be taking money out of your pocket which would be better spent on your family.
     
  17. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Google Quantum Neurons - you may find interesting properties of human mind
     
  18. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,746
    Originally Posted by Quantum Quack
    it is all part of a book yet to be published if I get the time to complete it: "The physics of God"


    Rubbish... i predict you'r book will sell very well.!!!
     
  19. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    Thanks kmguru

    "The quantum mind hypothesis proposes that classical mechanics cannot fully explain consciousness and suggests that quantum mechanical phenomena such as quantum entanglement and superposition may play an important part in the brain's function and could form the basis of an explanation of consciousness.

    Supporters of the quantum mind hypothesis have not submitted any evidence to support its claims for peer review, but the hypothesis has also not been falsified. As such, the hypothesis is still in its early phases.
    "
    c/o wiki... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind

    if you have another look at the Objectivity and how it can be acheived thread you can actually start to see the possibility of a quantum explanation for the universal consciousness that generates the entanglements...and vica versa how entanglements could possibly generate universal consciousness.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2009
  20. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    You may recall I have used the "unlocked safe door that automatically locks when you attempt to open it" analogy?
    This is the experience that they have found when trying to promote communication between two entangled half particles. The entanglement changes so that this information can not be transmitted.

    I have been writing about why psychic communicative events can not be proven in quite a few threads:

    This basic law if you like is why psychic communciations of any type can not be proved deliberately as a general rule of thumb.
    As soon as the attempt is made deliberately the safe door locks...see?
    But of course "accidental", "instinctive" or coincidental communciations happen all the time...
    the locking of the door is analoguous with "inertia" or resistance to change.
     
  21. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,542
    thanks clueluss.....I have given up on what's his names attitude...and stalking
     
  22. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,746
    Well... i emagine Whitley Strieber also had his critics befor he published a book but hes done oK for hisself.!!!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page