A Person or Just a Baby

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by CutsieMarie89, Jul 5, 2009.

  1. Dub_ Strange loop Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    156
    That's a good observation, but on the other hand, there are scores of people who never learn to use language for any of a number of reasons, and there seems to be no norm against referring to them by name.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. visceral_instinct Monkey see, monkey denigrate Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,913
    I don't see how it's dehumanizing. It emphasises that they're vulnerable and should be looked after.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    Well sure. There are plenty of other attributes people develop that define them as human. But I can't help wondering whether parents delay calling those babies by name just a little longer than they would for a baby that develops language ability?

    Even dogs and cats recognize their names. If a person's language facility is so dysfunctional that he doesn't know his name, there is no practical value in trying to teach it to him, so it becomes simply a label for use in conversations with other people.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dub_ Strange loop Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    156
    That's a pretty good question. :idea:
     

Share This Page