# $45 TRILLION dollars to combat "Human Caused" global warming.... Here we go Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by Cazzo, Jun 7, 2008. 1. ### CazzoRegistered Senior Member Messages: 1,031 Further "human caused" global warming Hype to screw over humanity.$45,000,000,000,000 to help stop global warming please :

Let's see, 1 to 5 % of the CO2 in the atmosphere is "human made", and only 0.0383% of the atmosphere is CO2. And that's going to destroy the planet ?....

We saw this coming, and worse, now the UN and other global warming disciples are going to use this as an excuse to tax the shit out of industries and everyone. No wonder socialists and leftists are so fond of the "human caused" global warming "science".

Who knows, maybe next they'll use "human caused" global warming "science" as an excuse to make a 1 world Socialist-Communist nation, apply martial law to humanity, execute "greedy" "right-wing" capitalist company members. Maybe even round up a few billion people and starve/work them to death like the Communists did in the 20th century ! That should take care of the "human CO2 problem". :jason:

Last edited: Jun 7, 2008

3. ### CarcanoValued Senior Member

Messages:
6,865
Yes, Ive been repeating these stats for years now...as well as the fact of CO2 being a mild player, compared to water vapour and methane.

Dont worry...when people start paying $200/barrel they will forget all about global warming. 4. ### Google AdSenseGuest Advertisement to hide all adverts. 5. ### spidergoatValued Senior Member Messages: 51,740 Vitamin C is a tiny percentage of your blood, but without it you would die. I would explain the CO2 thing to you Cazzo, but you're a scientific retard. 6. ### Google AdSenseGuest Advertisement to hide all adverts. 7. ### madanthonywayneMorning in AmericaStaff Member Messages: 12,461 Regardless of whether anthropogenic global warming is a real threat, I doubt it would be worth$45 trillion dollars to combat it. If oceans rise, build some dams. No big deal.

That's always been my point regarding global warming. I don't care if it's real or not, we can't afford to do anything about it, so we'd best just adapt to any changes in average temperature we do see.

Meanwhile, half measures like "cap and trade" serve simply to impoverish us and decrease our ability to adapt to a changing planet.

8. ### CazzoRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
1,031
Resorting to personal insults already, that was quick.
By the same token, I can add a few drops of water to my soda and it won't make a difference to the taste or how it's digested.

Just out of curiosity, please provide us with a scientific proof that adding enough CO2 to the atmosphere to alter it by a small fraction of a percent will destroy society. Entertain my scientifically "retarded" mind

9. ### iceauraValued Senior Member

Messages:
24,092
Why is it that the self-described "realistic", "conservative", fact based, money talking, you-can't-fool-me guys have so little attachment to physical reality ?

How hard is it to check a number ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas

It's getting so that simply agreeing with the arguments from evidence of the ordinary consensus of ordinary reputable investigators in even ordinary, well-investigated matters, puts one at odds with the majority of "conservative" people in the US.

CO2 drives water vapor - without CO2, there would be much less water vapor in the air. Methane is not persistent - does not accumulate.

Last edited: Jun 7, 2008
10. ### MetaKronRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
5,502
Ice Aura, you pulled that one directly out of your ass.

11. ### Diode-ManAwesome User TitleRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
1,372

Last edited: Jun 7, 2008
12. ### iceauraValued Senior Member

Messages:
24,092
And you aren't going to waste one moment of your precious "thinking" time on actually checking out whatever it was, are you.

13. ### CarcanoValued Senior Member

Messages:
6,865
Only assuming CO2 drives temperature...circular argument.

14. ### spidergoatValued Senior Member

Messages:
51,740
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

15. ### CazzoRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
1,031
LOL, the main page to wikipedia.

Once again, please provide us with a scientific proof that adding enough CO2 to the atmosphere to alter it by a small fraction of a percent will destroy society. Entertain my scientifically "retarded" mind

16. ### MetaKronRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
5,502
You didn't give a source.

17. ### MontecRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
248
Hello all

Three words. Atmosheric continuum absorption . Or if you prefer from here.

Unknown processes that affect the heat gain of the atmosphere have yet to be understood. I guess there is no money or political power to be gained.

18. ### spidergoatValued Senior Member

Messages:
51,740
You do the math.

Messages:
9,214
20. ### MetaKronRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
5,502
Who would have thought that the sun could cause global warming?

Messages:
51,740

Messages:
889
23. ### iceauraValued Senior Member

Messages:
24,092
Andre's really fond of this graph, for some reason.

The upper black line is from one model in 1988. The models did not even include clouds, jet contrails, the Ninas, etc.

The other lines show a generally and rapidly increasing global temperature, even including times of significant La Nina years. But never mind.

The pattern does not match any driving force so far proposed except greenhouse gases.
It's not circular, it's cause and effect.

Water vapor does not maintain itself in the air at current temp regimes - it precipitates out, etc.