R1D2
And Grumpy,
The army has switched to the Beretta M9 a 9mm pistol.
The 380 was used as a back up weapon by many for years.
Yes, a huge mistake IMHO. The reason they gave was commonality with NATO. Now everyone in NATO has an underperforming sidearm, whee.:wtf:
The US adopted the 1911 early in WW1 and only changed it a few years ago. There is a reason we kept it for nearly a
century. Hit someone in the arm with a 9mm and he can still shoot you dead WITH THAT ARM. Hit someone in the arm with a 45 and he will have to pick himself up off the floor and he cannot shoot you with that arm, assuming the arm is still attached. A solid body shot knocks even the biggest assailant down. As I said, the most proven man stopper on the face of the planet. It's a little outdated, but I see it as having been developed and debugged for a century, we know how to make them reliable and accurate, and the 9mm round is just too wimpy for a military cartridge(or home defense). Even a 40 is marginal.
Yes, they use them as backups, but today even their service weapon is too small, you'll need a BU gun with more punch. Police officers are sometimes required to carry 9s with hardball, a lot of them are going with something like this for a backup
The Double Tap. Two 45 rounds in the barrels, two in the grip. I would rather have two 45s than a whole clip of 9mm.
Kimber Ultra Carry II. 7 rounds 45 ACP, 25 ounce(about 1.5 pounds)loaded.
Or a Glock 36, 7 rounds 45.
Just because it's a backup doesn't mean it has to be just a noise maker. It would be more effective to hit the perp over the head with a 380 pistol than it would be to shoot them with it(at least in the few seconds of combat, it doesn't matter if the perp finally falls down if he has enough time to kill you first). Even the best 9mm is no better, too many cops have been killed by perps that already have a dozen or more 9mm in them.
Grumpy