The Sun is 100% efficient

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by John99, Feb 23, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    False. You don't even read your "sources".

    I quote:
    Nearly 100% is NOT 100%.
    Nothing is 100% efficient.

    And even if the Sun were 100% efficient that says nothing whatsoever about whether or not the Earth is a finite sphere. (Which it is).

    Typical fail from you.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I saw that in the link but figure someone would want to read anyway.

    The sun (a sun) is 100% self sufficient. I didnt google google it.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    But it is not finite in every way.
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Bullshit. Finite is finite.
    You'll have to be somewhat more specific than that.

    I see. You make a claim and knowingly post a link that directly contradicts you.
    Reported for more intellectual dishonesty.

    In other words you don't have anything at all to support your uniformed belief and expect other people to do your work for you. Nothing is 100% efficient.
     
  9. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I alredy was. I said that plants keep growing (non-finite) etc. Read the posts.

    I see. You make a claim and knowingly post a link that directly contradicts you.
    Reported for more intellectual dishonesty.
    [/QUOTE]

    How did it contradict me? I never siad anything about absorption.

    And how are you supporting that is isnt?
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    And you contend that they will keep growing forever? That nutrients etc will never run out?
    Finite is finite is not infinite. Got it yet?

    You claimed that the Sun is 100% efficient. That link specifically stated that Sun is NOT 100% efficient.
    Plus, of course, your earlier comment "I saw that in the link but figure someone would want to read anyway" is a tacit admission that you were aware you were bullshitting.

    Ever heard of the Laws of Thermodynamics?
    It is a scientific fact that nothing is 100% efficient.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    "Not relying on other sources" is not a definition of efficiency. Fail.

    Which does nothing to support your point.

    You're also ignoring the slight problem that if the Sun were 100% efficient we wouldn't be here. The heat and light from the Sun are a by-product of the processes going on inside it - i.e. an indication that it is not 100% efficient.
     
  13. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    So what? Then by your definition a rock is 100% efficient.
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    A rock doesn't do anything.
    Therefore efficiency doesn't enter into it.
     
  15. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    you have to remeber, inorder to prove\show efficiency a process needs to take place.:itold:
     
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Remember?
    You're attempting to lecture me after the crass ignorance you've demonstrated so far?

    Correct, so let's go back to your ridiculous claim about what I'd say of a rock: what process does a rock do?

    And, and also for your information, it's not my definition, it's the one given by science.
     
  17. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Lets back up:

    correct. we can also use result instead of by-product.

    How does that show it is not 100% efficient? It is not relying on anything else...simple.
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    What "result"?

    The only simple thing here is you. If there is a by-product (of any kind or magnitude) then the process by definition is not 100%, since a percentage is going into producing the by-product.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    So producing something means it is not 100% efficient? Never heard that before.
     
  20. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Ho hum.
    Is that deliberate dishonesty or ignorance on your part?
    It's getting so I can't tell these days. I used to ascribe your comments to ignorance but, given your recent history, I'm hard-pressed to distinguish now.
     
  21. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Lets make this simple:

    If i light a candle and it burns forever (on its own) is the candle 100% efficient?
     
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    No. Again the light and heat from a candle are by-products (a sign of inefficiency) in the process of combustion.
    For someone who claimed he spends much of his time reading you are appallingly uninformed. What, exactly, do you read? Airport blockbusters?
     
  23. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_efficiency

    Look closely at the quote above. The reason the sun is 100% efficient is because it produces heat and light but there is no loss. In other words it remains the same but the other key component is nothing is added.

    100% efficiency.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page