Non-pathogenic bacteria

Discussion in 'Biology & Genetics' started by Cell_Catcher, Feb 12, 2010.

  1. Cell_Catcher Registered Member

    Messages:
    2
    Hi people.
    I'm thinking about this question: There are many non patogenic bacterias?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Idle Mind What the hell, man? Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,709
    Yes, there are many non-pathogenic species of bacteria.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Messages:
    2,828
    In fact, I suspect that the vast majority of all the species of bacteria are non-pathogenic to humans.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Naturelles Future Scientist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    214
    Yeap, there are also non-pathogenic bacteria which can become pathogenic under certain circumstances. For instance if bacteria in your large intestine get into your bloodstream, it'll cause infection.

    Correct me if I'm wrong.
     
  8. Cell_Catcher Registered Member

    Messages:
    2
    Thanks to all.

    For example, E.Coli normally is non-pathogenic, right?
     
  9. Naturelles Future Scientist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    214
    Yes, a large mass of feces is E. coli, however if it enters the bloodstream it can be deadly.
     
  10. WillNever Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,595
    You have bacteria in your GI tract and on your skin that are non-pathogenic, called "normal flora."
     
  11. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    Remember that your body is a torus, and your gastrointestinal tract is the hole in that doughnut, completely outside your body. Anything that remains in the confines of that tract and does not pass through the intestinal walls into your blood is basically just as external--and just as non-pathogenic--as if it were on sitting in your hand.
     
  12. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    I seem to recall it being described as "a tube within a tube". Only what's between the two tubes is really "in" your body.
     
  13. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    HAY!!!!

    when i said the GI tract was outside the body im sure you (along with orlander) were ridiculing me for it until mad pointed out that is how med views the body

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    Topologically, the "inner tube" is contiguous with the "outside" and they form a single space.
    Not me. I have always understood that.
     

Share This Page