Circumcision Decision

Wouldn't the lack of sensitivity during sex allow you to last longer?
 
Why wouldn't you allow herself to do the choice?
I know girls that don't like to wear earings.
 
Why? Do you live in Africa? Does your tribe require to do that? :bugeye:

No :bugeye:. It's only now that i have grown up, i do realise it's unnecessary, but a part of me still sees it as being preferable. But i would agree with the point that it is unnecessary.
 
There must be some sick psychological reason for parents wanting to mutliate their children for none other than cultural/cosmetic reasons - parents initiating their children into gender or something. Strange really. Initiation is meant to be done at an age when the child understands what's going on. Doing it so early means that parents are doing it just for their own benefit. Which is sick.
 
I agree with Avatar. It's cruel, hurtful, and it serves no purpose. If a child can learn to clean properly, there's no reason to do it.
 
Originally posted by Orleander
I know I do [prefer circumsized].
There is no way I'd ever put an uncircumcised penis in my mouth. ewwww

Hahah! Scandalous!
I feel the same way.
 
There must be some sick psychological reason for parents wanting to mutliate their children for none other than cultural/cosmetic reasons.....

my cousin had his ears pinned back when he was a kid. It made his life a lot easier.
Don't know why you think surgery on children is mutilation. My child had a labial frenectomy. That wasn't mutilation.
 
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/

how is type one different from male circumsion?

ITS NOT

both are wrong unless a) you chose to do it to yourself or b) its done for clinical reasons

From your link:
* Type I - excision of the prepuce, with or without excision of part or all of the clitoris;
* Type II - excision of the clitoris with partial or total excision of the labia minora;
* Type III - excision of part or all of the external genitalia and stitching/narrowing of the vaginal opening (infibulation);
* Type IV - pricking, piercing or incising of the clitoris and/or labia; stretching of the clitoris and/or labia; cauterization by burning of the clitoris and surrounding tissue;
* scraping of tissue surrounding the vaginal orifice (angurya cuts) or cutting of the vagina (gishiri cuts);
* introduction of corrosive substances or herbs into the vagina to cause bleeding or for the purpose of tightening or narrowing it; and any other procedure that falls under the definition given above.

You're seriously equating that to male circumcision?
 
look at type one (and yes i have actually SEEN type IV). Do i see a difference between cutting the skin off the top of the cliterious and cutting the skin off the top of the penus? NOPE I dont
 
It basically shows a newborn baby boy strapped into a "Circumstraint". And it has a pictorial review with description of what is being done to the child during the procedure. How anyone could do this to their child for no medical reason is beyond me. It is just as frightening as the description of a female circumcision.
 
[
look at type one (and yes i have actually SEEN type IV). Do i see a difference between cutting the skin off the top of the cliterious and cutting the skin off the top of the penus? NOPE I dont


lol, not looking, thx. I don't think pain is an issue for infant male circumcision.

More from your link:
Long-term consequences include cysts and abscesses, keloid scar formation, damage to the urethra resulting in urinary incontinence, dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) and sexual dysfunction and difficulties with childbirth.

Psychosexual and psychological health: Genital mutilation may leave a lasting mark on the life and mind of the woman who has undergone it. In the longer term, women may suffer feelings of incompleteness, anxiety and depression.

Not slightly like male circumcision in those respects.
 
Back
Top