That is not an argument. You started a thread; it's up to you to make a case - here in this thread - and defend it. It's in the rules.
It's an assertion from other people that you haven't read yet. Google, read, post. Don't skip any steps.
OK. Here's my refutation: www.google.com The rest is up to you. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You first. When asked to explain your assertion, you provided a link - and nothing else - as if it's our responsibility to develop your assertion for you. When asked for my refutation, I provided a link - and nothing else - because, after all, it's your responsibility to develop my refutation for me. Right?
You have to do the work to find my argument. That's your precedent, right? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Look, when I asked you to defend your assertion, you felt that all you had to do was provide a link - with no explanation - no words of your own - and, apparently the onus on others to go and read the entire thing as if that's your assertion. That's not how it works. You are here, making some sort of assertion (what that assertion is, is still not entirely clear). So you make it. Yourself. A link is not an argument. You may, however, reference the link, to back up your own argument.
That is not an explanation. That is your premise - so far, nothing but your baseless opinion. You have not defended it. The refutation is as simple as: There are no higher forms and no one has manipulated our genes. Full stop.