Ignoring all your generalised off topic remarks, the above doozies seem to indicate that you do have some sort of problem as rpenner has alluded to. Let me say now, irrespective of mine and others suspicions, I'll give you a fair go, and hold you to what you have claimed you are here for, learning. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Because really, that would be great! So all the best with that. Again let me assure you there is nothing wrong in being a lay person like yourself and I, as long as we are prepared to learn without any agenda blinkering our views, and as long as we are able to sift the wheat from the chaff. The ball's in your court.
Thanks, James R, for your suggestion. I was already working towards doing that but I wanted to get a better feel for what's going on before I go that option; as I don't want to cut my nose off to spite my face by acting too hastily and possibly missing some important snippet of information or idea which I would have liked to have caught, even if it was posted by a member I would rather not dialogue with directly. I will take your advice in a partial form though; I'll ignore certain posters in effect rather than by resort to that software function; because I like to give people a chance to improve if initially found wanting.
All I have asked is for your credentials? You know mine so what's the big deal? Like I said in my previous post, you'll get a fair go. And I have asked you other questions. Could you answer them please?
It's amazing how lay people that obviously have a beef against GR or any other aspect of cosmology, can never answer simple questions re their own expertise in what they accept and what they don't accept.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! That tells an interesting story.
Will you stop demanding personal information from people. I highly recommend not to disclose any personal information to these cranks. And stop spamming my thread to oblivion! I'm starting a new thread on this topic. You have disclosed that voluntarily, so stop forcing personal information from other people. My thread is not your credential verification spot. You'll never get a fair go from OCD paddoboy. Dont answer anything as he has asked no reasonable on topic questions. The mods let him do as he pleases.
When cranks and fools make claims about something they are totally ignorant of, I will most certainly ask about credentials. You need to live with that even though it will expose you as a probable fraud....or anyone else for that matter that claims to rewrite 21st century science on a remote science forum. Sorry ol fella!
Oh, and the speed of light is still always a constant at "c" the last time I looked. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Live with that too.
Your thread???? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! No, it's open to all. Live with that also.
This is a public forum that when signing up requires no credentials to be disclosed, so why do you as a mere user think you have the right to demand it of people? Stay on topic in my thread or leave! Sorry ol fella!
READ MY LIPS! Again if people want to make silly claims like c+v then it will be refuted. You raised the issue not particularly addressed to you.....I suggest you stay on topic.Oh, hold on! You don't have one! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Yep OK, great stuff. let's see you write up a paper and produce the evidence, because so far you have none. Or keep preaching it to the world [well this science forum at least Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!] It's still getting you nowhere.
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/einsteins-special-relativity.html The principle of relativity: The laws of physics don’t change, even for objects moving in inertial (constant speed) frames of reference. The principle of the speed of light: The speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion relative to the light source. (Physicists write this speed using the symbol c.) The genius of Einstein’s discoveries is that he looked at the experiments and assumed the findings were true. This was the exact opposite of what other physicists seemed to be doing. Instead of assuming the theory was correct and that the experiments failed, he assumed that the experiments were correct and the theory had failed.
There's plenty of experimental proof, but hey! In actual fact as others have told you, the onus of proof is on you.
I must be off now my friend...at least, as I said the other day, I do give you some kudos for at least posting in the right section. Oh, and that's a compliment! have fun!!!
And the proof follows, but you cant comprehend it. By you not being able to critically think for yourself I understand why you cant process the information and see why light travels at c + v. You are not the one who produced the theory of only c and have only the ability to show other peoples work, a science reporter in other words. In future you'll be showing/defending my work to others, lol. At least my work wont leave behind generations of lobotomized cranks defending it. So you'll be able to report and defend it with confidence that its what the experiments show, no assumptions needed...
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer