What I hate is when foreigners come into a country and give their kids strange names that evidence their desire to never assimilate, and here I am thinking of Norman England and weird sounding French names (weird to the English ear anyway) that started popping up amongst the Frenchies, like "Robert," "Allison," "William," "Amy," "Louis," "Richard," "Henry," "Emma," "Roger" etc. As we all know from history, the Normans miserably failed to assimilate, a failure based, almost entirely, on their many foreign-sounding names.
And don't even get me started on the non-assimilation of the Jews with all their weird foreign sounding names, like "Aaron," "Rachel," "Benjamin," "Daniel," "Elizabeth," "Michael," "Sarah," etc. Do Jews expect to be taken seriously with names like that?
(Kidding, of course.)
I think there is no good evidence that "strange" sounding names are a serious hindrance to assimilation or social cohesiveness. There was a study that showed that in the U.S. having a "black sounding" name on top of a resume seriously lessened the likelihood of getting an interview, as compared to the exact same resume with a more traditional American name on it. SO it seems like I have seen more evidence of "the culture" being hostile to offbeat ethnic names than vice versa.
I am sticking to giving my kids good, old-fashioned traditional names, like the Gaelic "Siobhan" (pronounced "Shi-VAHN").
