a series of questions
laws can be amended or discarded if found to be a source of conflict or simply unworkable. a replacement could be used if required. the sanctity and reverance is a relic of ancient superstition
your thoughts?
moderator edits and deletions
the assumption here is a mod is both rational and logical.
furthermore it is assumed that he or she is knowledgleble about the content that is being moderated
is this always a given?
lets work a simple hypothetical scenario
i post 1+1=2
mod disagrees and deletes as unscientific
i am astounded and insist on my version by a repost
i am banned/whatnot by this particular mod
comment from this point on to the resolution of affair
what dialogue if any takes place?
possible solutions. unknown if practical
1- bad calls could be ruled out by vetting all edits and deletions by a team of mods. errors in judgment can be minimized to the furthest possible extent, a repost could be then dealt with according to community standards/law. an automatic penalty is imposed. no negotiations necessary
2 - the repost can be allowed to stand without penalty until scrutinized by a team of mods. this would rule out any miscarriage of justice
--------------------------------------------------
solution 2 should be implemented
it is galling to be subjected to a dumbfuckmod
you guys should know this
fix. this shit can be worked out
laws can be amended or discarded if found to be a source of conflict or simply unworkable. a replacement could be used if required. the sanctity and reverance is a relic of ancient superstition
your thoughts?
moderator edits and deletions
the assumption here is a mod is both rational and logical.
furthermore it is assumed that he or she is knowledgleble about the content that is being moderated
is this always a given?
lets work a simple hypothetical scenario
i post 1+1=2
mod disagrees and deletes as unscientific
i am astounded and insist on my version by a repost
i am banned/whatnot by this particular mod
comment from this point on to the resolution of affair
what dialogue if any takes place?
possible solutions. unknown if practical
1- bad calls could be ruled out by vetting all edits and deletions by a team of mods. errors in judgment can be minimized to the furthest possible extent, a repost could be then dealt with according to community standards/law. an automatic penalty is imposed. no negotiations necessary
2 - the repost can be allowed to stand without penalty until scrutinized by a team of mods. this would rule out any miscarriage of justice
--------------------------------------------------
solution 2 should be implemented
it is galling to be subjected to a dumbfuckmod
you guys should know this
fix. this shit can be worked out