that "nothing is true" is true then?To wit: that there is such a thing as 'truth'.
that "nothing is true" is true then?To wit: that there is such a thing as 'truth'.
that "nothing is true" is true then?
![]()
There are no truths, only perspectives.
(1) What is your motivation for pursuing truth? Ie., what is driving you to pursue truth?
(2) What is your justification for pursuing truth? Ie., why do you think it is right to pursue truth?
Ya that's what I meant(I need to install firefox(spellcheck) on my work laptop).
Pursuing is the best we can do and the OP implies that by using the word "pursuit".
There are no truths, only interpretations (perspectives).
doesn't change anythingdefine perspective
so it's true that there are only perspectives?
![]()
doesn't change anything
if I say there is no such thing as X only Y, I am saying that Y is true
so its a case of it being true that existent things aren't true?No contradiction here: nietzschefan had already differentiated "perspective" from 'truth'. There is no claim that a perspective qualifies as true, merely that perspectives are existent.
yesIt does indeed.
Only if one has established that X and Y are contraries and that teh relationship must be mutually exclusive.
so its a case of it being true that existent things aren't true?
(the plot thickens ....)
yes
alternatively it could be true that X=Y
![]()
greenburg said:(1) What is your motivation for pursuing truth? Ie., what is driving you to pursue truth?
define: truth
conformity to reality or actuality
???
This is exactly the problem I've pointed out.
You are assuming that there is an objective 'reality'........
what else can I assume?