Why black men have a bigger penis

[Count Sudoku]

Anyone who thinks the right to vote was given in the eighties (along with free pink leg-warmers) is a dumb-ass.
Also, people that think blacks received their rights in full and didn't have to fight through the sixties (that's right the 1960's) to get them is a dumb-ass.
It has been a very, very short time -- one generation basically -- since civil rights was the major issue in this country, and blacks were being killed for voting, and whites were being killed for helping them vote.
And they haven't gotten all their papers together to join the millionaires club yet - what animals... you damn racist.

Also, The whiteys fucked up the giveaway program.
What a surprise.

Bring up new orleans, and let's talk about who has rights. People with money and lawyers have rights. White black or chinese, it doesn't matter - money talks.

I could count how many Blacks and Whites were killed trying to vote on one hand. More Whites are killed by Blacks every day of the year.

I do agree the Whitey fucked up with his giveaway, but liberals of all colors are idiots so that's not exactly a big surprise.

Apparently OJ had the right to kill his dumb White wife and an innocent Jew who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Most Black folks think that's okay he got away scot free, I mean those few who actually think he isn't innocent. It takes a real moron to believe OJ was innocent but I guess only people who were properly educated could figure out something so obvious.

 

[Count Sudoku]

Stop right there at blatant lie #1. I have seen it in action. I have seen differences in police action which can only be based on racism.
Not to mention the thousands of reports and eyewitnesses testifying otherwise.

When you read a blatant lie, doesn't that make most people stop and consider what they are reading.
You don't obviously, you just swallow it down like a good drone.

Yeah, because I'm White if I go into a cop station are start shooting people the cops will ignore me and find some Black guy on the street drag him to the station and pin it on him.

I can assure you that any cop that works in a city that has Blacks in it will become "racist" in no time (even if they are Black themselves) because most of their problems originate in the Black community. That Blacks play the race card (part of that hustle you don't believe) and say "he only charge me cause I be Black" and other BullShit is no surprise, that you believe it is.

The stats are legit and if anything they are cooked to favour Blacks because the government pressures the court system to undercharge Blacks and overcharge Whites to balance out the crime stats more.

Remember Rodney King the S.O.B. who was pulled over for dangerous driving while high on drugs? Well he got a beating because the dumb bastard was resisting arrest even after being tazered twice. What's funny is that nothing happened to the other two Black passengers in his car that didn't resist arrest, but those cops were "racist" for beating on that dumb bastard who has since gone on to commit multiple crimes despite getting millions from the city (why I don't know) which of course he has long since pissed away.

 

[cole grey]

Egypt was not a Black society in its heyday, and in fact was destroyed by the increasing presence of Black Africans (the slaves) in its society, just like Portugal went down the toilet when the native population started mixing with its Black slaves. Tell an Egyptian in Egypt today that they are Black and they will probably kill you. Modern Egyptians look more like Arabs than Black people.

I believe you are completely mistaken in assuming that the modern egyptian arab looks like an ancient egyptian.
Here is a mural from the tomb of ramses the third where the egyptian is obviously quite "black". This doesn't prove much as the egyptians themselves seemed to be somehwat dark-skinned africans, but lighter skinned than the tribes to the south, they thought of themselves as different from the middle-eastern AND nubian tribes.

You prove that you use your perceptions and modern references too much when analyzing history, when you speak of modern egyptians.

But you didn't know that because you are too busy accepting what your damn racists tell you.

 

[cole grey]

Yeah, because I'm White if I go into a cop station are start shooting people the cops will ignore me and find some Black guy on the street drag him to the station and pin it on him.

great refutation. quite sensible you are.

 

[Count Sudoku]

I believe you are completely mistaken in assuming that the modern egyptian arab looks like an ancient egyptian.
Here is a mural from the tomb of ramses the third where the egyptian is obviously quite "black". This doesn't prove much as the egyptians themselves seemed to be somehwat dark-skinned africans, but lighter skinned than the tribes to the south, they thought of themselves as different from the middle-eastern AND nubian tribes.

You prove that you use your perceptions and modern references too much when analyzing history, when you speak of modern egyptians.

But you didn't know that because you are too busy accepting what your damn racists tell you.

AFAIK, the lighter skinned Egyptians ruled and the Blacks were brought in as slaves. You might as well say the South before the civil war was a Black society because there were Blacks in it.

Speaking of which, if Blacks are just as smart as everyone, how come they were living in the stone age when White people first encountered them?

 

[Count Sudoku]

great refutation. quite sensible you are.

Try reading the other dozen or so sentences. The first was just sarcasm, maybe you need a little emoticon to figure it out.

 

[cole grey]

I could count how many Blacks and Whites were killed trying to vote on one hand.

It isn't about people killed actually walking to the booth, but about people killed because of the situation, i.e. more than five.


IQ question -
how many fingers does a human have on each hand?
a) eight b) ten c) five d) i don't know

 

[cole grey]

AFAIK, the lighter skinned Egyptians ruled and the Blacks were brought in as slaves. You might as well say the South before the civil war was a Black society because there were Blacks in it.

Speaking of which, if Blacks are just as smart as everyone, how come they were living in the stone age when White people first encountered them?

the lighter skinned africans ruled.
You thought they were arabs... hahaha.

 

[cole grey]

Speaking of which, if Blacks are just as smart as everyone, how come they were living in the stone age when White people first encountered them?

perhaps the society hadn't needed to change because it worked under the environmental pressures applied.
You don't know anything about why this is the case, so why would you bring it up?
Because it an unscientific perception that can be made to look as though it is relevant to your ideas, as is all of your evidence.

Oh, yeah, I liked how you point out that the government "overcharges" whites and "undercharges" blacks when they commit crimes - from what space-alien baby jesus-sighting reference did you pull that one?

 

[Count Sudoku]

the lighter skinned africans ruled.
You thought they were arabs... hahaha.

Quite frankly they are about as "African" as the white people that settled South Africa. The people lived right next to the Asian border. When Rome was at war with Carthage (in Libya) and destroyed it, they weren't at war with Black people.

 

[Count Sudoku]

It isn't about people killed actually walking to the booth, but about people killed because of the situation, i.e. more than five.


IQ question -
how many fingers does a human have on each hand?
a) eight b) ten c) five d) i don't know

Blacks have killed at least 10 Whites for every Black killed by a White and have accomplished this in the last 20 years alone. The only reason people are under the delusion that crime is equal is because the media hypes up the rare White on Black crime (BS gang rape case at Duke anyone?) while ignoring the approximately 10 or so Black on White gang rapes that happen everyday. Even when they do cover the odd exceptional crime, they go out of there way to cover up the race of the victim(s) and suspect(s).

Go look up the Zebra Killlings or the Wichita Massacre. Oh, what's that? never heard of those?, not a surprise the MSM didn't cover it despite how awful they were.

 

[Count Sudoku]

perhaps the society hadn't needed to change because it worked under the environmental pressures applied.
You don't know anything about why this is the case, so why would you bring it up?
Because it an unscientific perception that can be made to look as though it is relevant to your ideas, as is all of your evidence.

Oh, yeah, I liked how you point out that the government "overcharges" whites and "undercharges" blacks when they commit crimes - from what space-alien baby jesus-sighting reference did you pull that one?

I do know Blacks lived in the stone age before Whitey showed up which is odd considering how easy it was to acquire food there. Shit, they didn't have to grow anything, they could just reach up and grab something to eat. They didn't even figure out cooking meat with fire.

As for the under/overcharge, I can say this because the FBI considers any Hispanic on Black "hate crime" to be a White hate crime while any White on Hispanic "hate crime" is considered a White hate crime as well.

Anyone that wants more info should check out amren.com

 

[cole grey]

I am simply saying that when you have opinions based on perceptions and not science you should uphold the one that confers equality and human rights, rather than the one that supports continuing violence and hatred, war and destruction, which racism of all kinds caused and still causes.

But you racists can go on about your racist business, and choose the path of hate, it is your life.

It is a good strategy to make racist whites with standard and substandard intelligence feel valuable. I personally don't need to use racism as a crutch, since my IQ is above average for a white, oriental, ashkenazi, black, hispanic or otherwise.

The fact is that judging an individual will always be a more accurate measure than judging a group - and NOBODY could possibly argue with that.

 

[valich]

Why black men have a bigger penis.


The men in Scandinavia have on average a smaller penis than people from Africa. We assume for the sake of argument that penis length is genetically determined although no scientific studies have identified the genetic regulators of penis length. Why would there be a size difference.

Scandinavian women do appreciate the longer penis. The theory that there has been sexual selection towards a smaller penis in Scandinavian countries therefore becomes implausible.

Evolution often works in strange ways. Here we propose a different theory on the size difference of the human penis.

The penis is a well vascularized organ. In this way it differs to a degree from other primate penises. The penis is not only well vascularized the blood flow to the penis can also be regulated. This can only mean one thing. The penis is a heat exchanger!

A comparable organ is the ear of the African elephant. It is well vascularized and has a large surface area. It is used to dissipate heat. The male penis is not only used for reproductive means, it is also a heat exchanger in the hot climate of Africa where humans emerged. A dual function of organs is not uncommon in the animal kingdom. The ears of the elephant are still used to hear.

When humans moved to Europe they finally ended up in cold Scandinavia. A large penis was evolutionary detrimental to survival. It dissipated too much heat. It shrank to reduce the surface area.

And that my friends is the truth and nothing but the truth so help me Darwin.

What scientific studies or comparisons show that "men in Scandinavia have on average a smaller penis than people from Africa"? I want to see data, not just hearsay or blind speculation. I whip out my big ten-inch for comparison.

 

[Count Sudoku]

I am simply saying that when you have opinions based on perceptions and not science you should uphold the one that confers equality and human rights, rather than the one that supports continuing violence and hatred, war and destruction, which racism of all kinds caused and still causes.

But you racists can go on about your racist business, and choose the path of hate, it is your life.

It is a good strategy to make racist whites with standard and substandard intelligence feel valuable. I personally don't need to use racism as a crutch, since my IQ is above average for a white, oriental, ashkenazi, black, hispanic or otherwise.

The fact is that judging an individual will always be a more accurate measure than judging a group - and NOBODY could possibly argue with that.

Fool, we are posting scientific evidence of IQ tests and how different groups test and crime statistics. We are not posting stories like the lone black guy in my high school was an idiot criminal. Anyone that objectively pays attention to the real world will see that what we post all adds up.

And you are right that we should also judge the individual (unless its affirmative action of course).

 

[Count Sudoku]

What scientific studies or comparisons show that "men in Scandinavia have on average a smaller penis than people from Africa"? I want to see data, not just hearsay or blind speculation. I whip out my big ten-inch for comparison.

I read somewhere that white dicks are actually a little bigger 6.4 cm average to 6.2 cm but the few other "studies" I've seen show black dicks to be a little bigger. What I also read is that black dicks are longer when not erect but don't expand that much as white dicks when they get hard. That's why guys think every black has a 14 inch dick when they see them in the change room.

 

[francois]

I got that from the same damn racist issue of that damn racist magazine that your link came from. Filled with blatantly unscientific pap - why would I think they check their sources?
As I said, that ain't no scientific paper - from what "scientific" sources did all the other "findings" in that chart arise?
Quack?

Yeah, you're right. The site is racist. But I had no idea what the site was. I just did a Google search for Rushton's paper on race and it just happened to be on that site. So I can't claim any affiliation with it. In any case, I didn't ask you to read or consider anything in that magazine. I simply asked you to consider Rushton's paper.

Now I'd like you to elaborate on why it is unscientific and incredible.

Would you prefer reading the same exact article if it came from charlesdarwinresearch.com?
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.or...f#search="philippe rushton "is race a valid""

 

[J.B]

 

[francois]

Cole Gray, I just read that whole article again in full. I fail to see anything racist in it. I also fail to see how it lacks in credibility.

 

[cole grey]

Fool, we are posting scientific evidence of IQ tests and how different groups test and crime statistics. We are not posting stories like the lone black guy in my high school was an idiot criminal. Anyone that objectively pays attention to the real world will see that what we post all adds up.

And you are right that we should also judge the individual (unless its affirmative action of course).

Look bitch, I am quite positive that your IQ is not over 200 points, and you are not some freakish super-genius, so your continued use of the word "fool", when addressing me, shows that you are obviously the fool.

If you can do nothing more than regurgitate racist pamphlets, you are a disgrace to the wonderful white members of the human race- of which there are great masses.

And yes, you are a bitch - I make that inference with full expectation that were I to have all the pertinent information you would be proven to be worthy of the epithet -
why else you would fight for racial recognition if you could get your own for yourself?

You still don't understand - to scientifically show a cause you have to prove the causes, not reveal correlations which may be resulting from other causes.