Tehran police chief caught with 6 naked prostitutes in a brothel

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3518069,00.html

What's cooler, the fact taht the guy responsible for "moralizing" Iran's capital by bullying Islamic values and dress on women was caught naked in a room with 6 naked prostitutes, or the fact that there are prostitutes in Iran, and that they feel safe enough to work in brothels?

This is even better than the story about the Christian closet homosexual church leader who bought jib and "only massage, but no sex" from a male prostitute.

Or the one about the governor of New York, who as a crusading Attourney General a few years ago led the fight against, among other things, prostitution rings, who himself is accused of being a john for at least the last 6 years

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(Oh, Spitz... you used to be the hero of every accounting student... what happened, man?)

Now, tell me how Iran is not jonesing for change? We can help them, you know. Yes we can!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Hehe

Good for him!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Let him hang. And the prostitutes (of any country).

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

otheadp,

You're actually surprised that prostitutes work at active brothels in Iran? Hah! Open your eyes, my son! My cousin went to Iran for business purposes last year, and he says that there are lots of places in Iran that are sleazier than downtown Vegas. Yes, they call themselves an Islamic Republic, but in certain aspects, they're the furthest thing from it.

 

What's "good for him" about it?

 

He got teh sechs?

 

lol
EXACTLY!

Not really. It's the oldest profession in the world, and my Iranian friend from highschool said he lost his virginity to a prostitute in Iran.

Maybe it shows the disconnect between the Revolution and what the people are really like. I mean, this guy was the chief of police.

 

At least they don't go around looking like prostitutes. Appearances are the only important thing to Allah. (also how else should people be in a brothel except naked)

 

I wouldn't go that far, considering it was the people who fought for and made the Revolution possible. I will say that the Great Khomeini's true vision has been ignored in recent times.

Another pointless comment by someone with no knowledge on the topic.

 

Heh. Prostitution, maybe they're really trying to westernise themselves.

 

The police, people, and students of the 70's fought for and made their Revolution possible. Today's police sleep with prostitutes, the people are oppressed (just ask Khatami), and the students protest against the intruding, unwanted, and as is now obvious, hypocritical interference from these agents of the Revolution, who don't even believe in it themselves.

Even Khomeini's grandson, his own flesh and blood, has been on house arrest for years.

I'd say there is a massive disconnect between yesterday's revolution, today's agents of that revolution, and the people of Iran.

 

As I said, the way in which the Great Khomeini had envisioned his nation has been ignored as time has progressed. They are becoming more and more rigid with their policies, although I don't think the Iranian people will tolerate a system that deviates too far from the realm of what they had fought for. I have faith that Grand Ayatollah Ali Khameini will restore some order to the nation, and fix the public's conerns to higher priorities (such as national safety, with the pending U.S. invasion).

 

That is the LEAST of their concerns. And Khameini is part of the problem. In fact, he is the problem. He is the head of the jurisprudence council who are supposed to disagree with him but don't, because they are either afraid of him, or are too stupid and useless to be using their power to govern. Under his watch well over 1/3 of all elections candidates are banned. He supports a conflict of civilizations by making Iranians believe that the United States is their biggest problem, not backwardness or high inflation rates or unemployment or crime and violence. Not even the fact that under him, despite Iran living on top of an ocean of oil, they have to import gasoline, and ration it.

Just like any tyrant in history, he blames it on some outside force and creates a dichotomy between the people he oppresses, and between it. See, it's all the US' fault that homosexuality and prostitution and other vice has creeped up into Iranian society. It's all the US' fault that the economy is shit. And it's all the US' fault that Iran has such a horrible image abroad, that the entire world is scared shitless of it.

The revolution is not the solution... be it the way it is now, or the way it was back in the day. Iran is hungry for some freedom. It's only a matter of time before Khameini and his buddies have to go into exile (probably in the US, too!)

You'll see. And then there will be the Revolution Museum where children will be taught, "this is how we used to live - imagine that!" And they'd get scared for a moment but then they'd go outside and everything will be alright again.

 

Y'all have been chanting that like a mantra for five years now. Still no invasion! I keep waiting for it, because I'm beginning to get the feeling that YOU want it more than we do.

1) we can barely afford Iraq
2) we can barely tolerate Iraq
3) we don't have the manpower for Iran
4) a Democrat will probably occupy the White House in less than a year, good luck with that

~String

 

I'm not sure what exactly it is you're going on about here. Iran's primary concern as of now is national safety, and they don't have to do too much research to come to this conclusion (considering the U.S.'s very own President has been continuously raising hostile talks about aggressive counteracts to Iran's supposedly "perilous nuclear program"). Iran, since the Revolution, has gotten (for the most part) exponentially stronger and wealthier, although the U.S.-encouraged Iran-Iraq war was successful in rendering the nation's growth stagnant for eight years consisting of expensive, costly, fruitless warfare. Their society isn't backward, either - merely, it isn't very appealing to a (Westerner?) like you. They are fine with the way they live their lives, for the most part. There is no doubting that they're a little on the "fundamentalist" side, but that's nothing compared to the results of some surrounding nations who have simply welcomed Western manipulation, and have refused to engage in revolutionary measures.

Is this baseless tirade even worth responding to? When you call Ali Khameini a tyrant, then all hope is lost for a sensible, civilized discussion. The man is a Grand Ayatollah who is adored by his people for his selfless efforts in the Iran-Iraq war. If he's a tyrant, then it's confusing as to why people support him to adamantly.

Oh no, my friend, revolution is the solution. They did what the West feared the most - a united, Islamic Republic based off a no-nonsense, fed-up group of people who fought to regain control of their homeland. Whenever the Iranians do something to anger the West, you know they are doing something to help themselves.

The U.S. realizes how capable Iran's military and manpower is, and knows that it will greatly exceed the difficulty in which Iraq and Afghanistan were invaded. Iran has a strong, patriotic, knowledgeable public that will not tolerate simply being invaded. As you can see from a geographical viewpoint, Iran has been completely surrounded to make the upcoming installment as easy as possible to achieve for the U.S.

 

The banned candidates were reinstated.

The problem is that some of the reformists are pro-US, which in Iran, is equivalent to treason.

 

Actually, I'd say one of Iran's biggest problems is how discriminatory and hateful they are to Sunnis. If they want the support of other neighbouring nations, they had better start showing some tolerance toward the denomination of their religion that makes up the overwhelming majority.

 

Everything you've just said confirmed what I was saying in my previous post

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You blame the US for all of your troubles (yes, the IR would've been more successful had the US not made it go to war for 8 years, as opposed to religious zealotry and good ol' clerical arrogant righteousness that if not started the war, certainly has prolonged it for 8 long years)... and you think the biggest challenge you're faced with is an imminent US attack, when nothing could be further from the truth.

You also praise Khameini as a beloved leader. Oh yes, he is dearly loved. Especially by the now former chief of police in Tehran

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Whatever sector of Iran loves him, loves him for the same reasons Stalin was loved. One reason is that he is feared, and another is for the propaganda. But even despite the domestic propaganda there are reform movements and prostitutes and gays and heroin traffickers, and even Israel lovers. Imagine that.

Yes, being pro-dialogue is indeed problematic. I hope none of those fools are ever elected in the US... If President Obama so much as gazes towards Iran he should be arrested for treason and sent to Evin prison and to be tortured to death.

As for the 1700 being reinstated ... I don't think so. That's today's date on the article. Notice who is doing the criticizing of the regime here.

 

Mostly being pro (US) dialogue is nonproductive, see Khatamis and Rafsanjhanis reign.

 

Mostly being pro (US) dialogue is nonproductive, see Khatamis and Rafsanjhanis reign.

And you're right, I read the reformists were to run, but I guess it does not mean all of them

Khomeini's granddaughter has spoken out against it