Bye.

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by superluminal, Dec 30, 2006.

  1. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    Well folks, it's been fun.

    But when posts that try to clarify the issue, especially to someone who is clearly a student and could use some pointers, are summarily deleted, then I've had enough. spidergoat has wiped out almost an entire page of posts in a philosophy thread.

    The level of censorship and "editing" has now become intolerable. I'm afraid to post even rational arguments now lest they be considered slightly off topic and erased. Stick robotically to the point or be erased. I can already find lots off forums like that.

    If anyone has any other good forums they'd like to recommend, I'll still check any PM's for a while.

    Good luck.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Another one bites the dust?

    To be fair he only did it in that one thread, to make a point I guess.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. imaplanck. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,237
    Ah man, all the cool people are getting popped in the balls.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    A point? A demonstration that attempting clarification or addressing a side issue that is relevant to a discussion will be deleted?

    Fuck that fucking shit.
     
  8. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Hmm.
    That seems to be a very strange thread.
    Spidergoat seems to be a convert to the Rokkon Rules of Decorum?
    I suppose he's trying to keep the thread true to the op's original intent and stand strong behind the rules posted in the opening thread?
    I strongly dislike the idea of such wholescale deletion, however.

    Some questions:

    Has spidergoat also done this type of thing in other threads or just this one thread?

    Do you disagree with the stated reasons behind the post deletions?

    Do you disagree with the validity of the rules given in the opening post?
     
  9. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    Hey planckster. I guess the only real point of doing anything here is to waste your time typing.
     
  10. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Well the point I guess is that such rules (Rokkons' that is) won't get the discussion anywhere.
     
  11. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    GOD DAMNIT TO HELL!!! SOMEONE NEEDS TO REDIRECT ME TO THE NOTES ADDED TO THE OP WHEN WE'RE ON PAGE TWO AND I DON'T LOOK AT THE OP ANYMORE!!!

    BEFORE I MAKE A TOTAL ASSHAT OUT OF MYSELF!!! FUCK!!!!

    Moderator's Note: I will attempt to satisfy Rokkon's Rules. Normal rules of moderation will be replaced by Rokkon's Rules for this thread only. Please post here only if you are willing to accept these rules. Thank you.
     
  12. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Spidergoat has made a statement in the opening post. A bit belated, I suppose:

    So that explains it.

    It is tough, I know, to have posts deleted like that. You've put time and effort into your replies and they are just summarily deleted. With a retroactive contract included in the opening post to explain why.
    But, perhaps you can let Spidergoat just do his thing with this thread?

    It's not like he's doing this everywhere, right?


    Perhaps a metathread discussing the rules are in order then and a new thread could be created with new rules?


    Heh.
    He didn't post that until after you'd already reacted. He only posted it moments ago.
    He should have posted it before he edited the thread.
    Live and learn.
     
  13. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    I had no idea that note was added when my posts started getting deleted! State any rules you want, who cares? Just, for fuck sake, warn a fellow, ok?
     
  14. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    welcome back!
     
  15. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    We missed you, buddy. Did you bring us anything?
    What's it like out there?
     
  16. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    Thanks everyone. Cold. Frightening. It's a freakin' mess out there. Raping, pillaging, interspecies sex, bingo nights... ugh.

    Well, now that my blood pressure's down I need a drink.
     
  17. imaplanck. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,237
    I think if this Regime continues there will only be compliant introverts left here. Quality of posts should be placed over strict rules in a good forum.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2006
  18. imaplanck. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,237

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Is there no goodness in their souls?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    I apologize for my editing of Rokkon's thread without warning. I have since made it a sticky and added an explanation at the top.
     
  20. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    I think it's a good idea, Spidergoat.
     
  21. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Thank you. If members tend to find this overly intrusive, I won't do it again.
     
  22. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Guys, we can't simply start bending the forum rules by allowing posters to post their own rules for each thread. If we do, we set precedent. And if I'm not mistaken, only the admins can do that.
     
  23. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    I don't see how this is setting a precedent for anything other than creative ways to stir up discussion.

    No rules are being broken or even bent.

    I think this is a neat idea and I'd like to see how it goes.
    I think that more thread could be created in a similar vein and this might even prompt discussion on formal rules for these formal threads.
    None of these rules will be carried over to the forum in general as the forums at large are not so formal as a thread such as this would be.

    And, mods are free to enforce their demesnes as they see fit.
    Spurious has already raised the bar on certain types of discussion in his forum and the admins have only supported his decision to do so.

    It's not like Spidergoat is going on a mad deleting spree in every thread in his forum.
    He's made one single thread into an experimental formal environment.


    Now. I do see some issues with the rules given. They are subject to some subjectivity.
    Perhaps better rules could be hashed out by those who wish to be involved in such an enterprise?


    I do agree here.
    This is not setting precedent for such a thing, however. It is merely being done at the whim of a moderator.
    Whimsy.
    Such has already a strong precedent for moderator action here.

    Posters can go ahead and post all the rules they like in their threads, but if not sanctioned by a mod in each case, then the rules are nothing but words.

    I should think that no more than one or maybe a few such formal threads should be active at any time.
    Especially considering that these threads would require massive investment of time by the moderator (assuming poster interst, that is.)
     

Share This Page