Wizard of Whatever
Registered Senior Member
Canada is not under the gun. Ukraine is. Replace Canadian leader with Taiwanese.
???I can't put a video or a photo here. They don't attach. If in words: addicts are always a little fussy, and the look... have you never seen drug addicts close? It’s just that Zelensky has been known for a long time, long before he became president. And then he was completely different. Watch the video with him when he was playing in KVN, and video with him now.
Вы посмотрели видео, которое я вам рекомендовала????
So you can't support your assertion / thought that Zelensky is a drug-addict. Okay.
As for being "a little fussy, and the look...", ffs, when he became President I'm sure he didn't expect Russia to invade, and to kill over 100,000 of his military, to injure 400,000 more, and to kill over 10,000 civilians. Do you think he might have a non-drug-related excuse to have "the look...", or to be "a little fussy"? And you compare him to when he was acting???
FFS, Olga. Either support your thinking that Zelensky is a drug addict, or, please, STFU.
She has a history of never supporting her outlandish claims. She will get distracted by the next shiny thing. Just watch.FFS, Olga. Either support your thinking that Zelensky is a drug addict, or, please, STFU.
You haven't recommended any specific video, you haven't posted any specific video, and nor have you linked to any, have you? You have even said (albeit via on-line translation) "I can't put a video or a photo here. They don't attach." So am I simply to guess which video you're referring to???Have you seen the video I recommended to you?
And I certainly don't give a damn about your opinion. The facts stand that Putin is an ignorant bully, who has invaded a neighbor. The whole world other then the other bully, stands behind Ukraine.I don't give a damn about your opinion.
Wow!! You certainly have a problem. In Australia we have a universal health care system that also takes in mental health. You should come to Australia.No, l'm going to be like you for six months talking some shit.
bbbbbbnnnnnnddddwwwwzzzz...uuuuuu. And further more, aaaaaffffffzzzzzooooqqqqyyyyouuu. Prove me wrong.А это правда, что Зеленский наркоман?
Yes, when a leader's political adversary makes an accusation, that's definitive proof. You are coming across as a gullible child. And Poroshenko was hardly their first president. That was Leonid Kravchuk, twenty years earlier.And it wasn't our propagandists who accused him of cocaine addiction; it was Petro Poroshenko, their first president, who did so first.
Пост 17, там я рассказала вам какое видео вы можете посмотреть. Похоже, вы его пропустили.You haven't recommended any specific video, you haven't posted any specific video, and nor have you linked to any, have you? You have even said (albeit via on-line translation) "I can't put a video or a photo here. They don't attach." So am I simply to guess which video you're referring to???
That's not how it works, Olga. You need to either post the video or a link to it, so that people can not be mistaken by what you are offering as evidence. I'm not going to hunt around for videos for you. Post the video, or post a link.Post 17, I told you what video you could watch. Looks like you missed it.
"Заседание с Зеленским в Ужгороде", на Ютьюбе есть этот ролик. А ссылки я прикрепить не могу физически, они не прикрепляются, а так я бы с удовольствием их прикрепила.That's not how it works, Olga. You need to either post the video or a link to it, so that people can not be mistaken by what you are offering as evidence. I'm not going to hunt around for videos for you. Post the video, or post a link.
And as for Petro Poroshenko, in April 2019 he explicitly said that he did not have evidence that Zelensky was a drug addict, and that he never called him that:
Poroshenko emphasized that he had never called his rival a drug addict.
"As for possible drug addiction allegations, I have said it three times and I say it for the fourth time now: I have no evidence that proves that Zelensky is a drug addict. And therefore, I never, I stress, never call him that," - https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/580695.html
So, I ask you again, Olga: what evidence do you have? Is it just propagandists trying to convince you (whether Russian or his Ukrainian political opponents)? Is it just some weak comparison between videos of him as a comedian pre-war and him as the leader of his people after 4 years of war and 100,000+ deaths and 400,000 wounded?
If you think he is a drug-addict, support your claims. That's how it works (or should work) here.
In any case this is all ad hominem and beside the point*, which is that Zelensky has proved - totally against Putin's expectations - to be an exemplary wartime leader in the mould of Churchill - who by the way was almost certainly an alcoholic, not that it matters.That's not how it works, Olga. You need to either post the video or a link to it, so that people can not be mistaken by what you are offering as evidence. I'm not going to hunt around for videos for you. Post the video, or post a link.
And as for Petro Poroshenko, in April 2019 he explicitly said that he did not have evidence that Zelensky was a drug addict, and that he never called him that:
Poroshenko emphasized that he had never called his rival a drug addict.
"As for possible drug addiction allegations, I have said it three times and I say it for the fourth time now: I have no evidence that proves that Zelensky is a drug addict. And therefore, I never, I stress, never call him that," - https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/580695.html
So, I ask you again, Olga: what evidence do you have? Is it just propagandists trying to convince you (whether Russian or his Ukrainian political opponents)? Is it just some weak comparison between videos of him as a comedian pre-war and him as the leader of his people after 4 years of war and 100,000+ deaths and 400,000 wounded?
If you think he is a drug-addict, support your claims. That's how it works (or should work) here.
You can still type/post the link. But, for whatever reason, you choose not to."Search with Zelensky in Uzhgorod", on Yutyube there is this video. And I can’t attach the links physically, they do not attach, and so I would love to attach them.
Говорю же вам, что я не могу прикрепить ссылку. Вернее, я прикрепляю, а она не отображается в ответе. Почему вы мне не верите? И какая проблема просто вбить в поисковик: "совещание с Зеленским в Ужгороде"? Я бы могла дать вам ещё название нескольких статей от наших наркологов, с их разборов поведения Зеленского, но они уж точно не будут для вас авторитетными.You can still type/post the link. But, for whatever reason, you choose not to.![]()
Because I'm not asking you to link to the address, but to simply provide the text of the link, as in:I'm telling you, I can't attach a link. Or rather, I attach, and it does not show up in the answer. Why don't you believe me?
https://www.sciforums.com/threads/world-statesmen.167330/page-2#post-3782468
Because that is asking someone to do your work for you. I don't know which meeting it might be that you're referring to, so the etiquette, the manners, is for you, the one making the claiming, to provide the details.And what is the problem just to drive into the search engine: "a meeting with Zelensky in Uzhgorod"?
No, they won't be considered authoritative, because Russian officials can not be considered impartial with regards Ukraine or its politicians. The same way that Trump's "election experts" (if had found any to support his case) would not have been considered authoritative when it comes to claiming the 2020 Presidential election to have been rigged.I could give you the name of several articles from our narcologists, from their analysis of Zelensky’s behavior, but they certainly will not be authoritative for you.
Саркус, я не обзывала тебя "придурком", почему ты так делаешь? Это соответствует правилам английского этикета?Because I'm not asking you to link to the address, but to simply provide the text of the link, as in:
hXXps://www.sciforums.com/threads/world-statesmen.167330/page-2#post-3782468
or
or even: h t t p s://www.sciforums.com/threads/world-statesmen.167330/page-2#post-3782468Code:https://www.sciforums.com/threads/world-statesmen.167330/page-2#post-3782468
There are means and ways of simply providing the text of a link, without the forum software trying to actually link to it. Use your head, ffs!
Because that is asking someone to do your work for you. I don't know which meeting it might be that you're referring to, so the etiquette, the manners, is for you, the one making the claiming, to provide the details.
No, they won't be considered authoritative, because Russian officials can not be considered impartial with regards Ukraine or its politicians. The same way that Trump's "election experts" (if had found any to support his case) would not have been considered authoritative when it comes to claiming the 2020 Presidential election to have been rigged.
I haven't called you a jerk. I have merely expressed exasperation at your inability to provide what has been asked for. I have even shown you how you can provide it that negates any issues you've been having. Yet still, even now, you can't be bothered.Sarkus, I didn't call you "jerk," why are you doing that? Does this fit the rules of English etiquette?
No. I want you to provide an actual link - i.e. the website address - so that I know I'm looking at the right video. Why is this so ****ing difficult for you?Once again: Strange behavior of Zelensky at a meeting in Uzhgorod. July 7, 2019 • YouTube. So will you be happy?