World At War-Battlefront Levant: "Gaza Is Burning"

Someone attacks your wife. You obliterate them.

Their brothers come to get revenge on you for killing their brother. You kill them, too.

Now their extended family shows up. After a battle, they kill you.

Your entire family goes after theirs.

And it never ends. In 20 years you have the Middle East.

Hamas has been trying this for decades. They get in a few good "obliterations" evern now and then. How's it working out for them?
Evil only exists. when good does nothing. Virtual obliteration won WW2, and now the enemies then are peaceful democracies.
 
Last edited:
An approach like that leaves most people on Earth dead. Fortunately most people are not like that.



In skydiving we have something called the 100 jump wonder. They get to 100 jumps (and survive) and decide "this stuff is easy! It's just falling! I can move through the air, I can land my parachute, wingsuiting doesn't look that hard. And it's really safe! I have never seen anyone get seriously hurt. And I have triple digit jumps!" That is the most dangerous period for skydivers, because they start taking risks they don't understand.

If they make it to 200 or 300 jumps, generally they realize that it IS hard, people DO die doing this, and they have a lot to learn. Perhaps a friend of theirs dies. Perhaps they get to know a 4 way competitor and realize how much work goes into that. Or they get to know a rigger and realize how much work goes into maintaining that parachute and how chaotic and uncontrollable the openings are.

At that point they become both a lot safer and a lot better at decision making. As instructors we would try to help them get to that point, but in the end only they could get there.
 
Evil only exists. when good does nothing.
.
Evil always exists. Always has, always will. At best we can limit it.

Virtual obliteration won WW2, and now the enemies then are peaceful democracies.

OK. So I guess the only way for this conflict to end is for Hamas to virtually eliminate Israel; then there will be two peaceful democracies afterwards.
 
Evil only exists. when good does nothing. Virtual obliteration won WW2, and now the enemies then are peaceful democracies.
Just think pulling babies from the rubble. Covered in blood dust not really crying, just confused and in pain. A four year old knows nothing of Sharia or the Israel/ Palestine conflict.
It's a kid that wants his mum and sisters.

Personally? Israel should have bombed the shit out of known targets and Mossad should have taken out targets in Europe and elsewhere following 7.10.25.

They may have got some, not many but it would not have mattered. That's the knee jerk.

Next step should have been an international effort, bring the hostages back, the UN go in. NO attacks on civilians bring back the hostages.
Two nation state talks? Hostage prisoner swap.
 
Evil only exists. when good does nothing. Virtual obliteration won WW2, and now the enemies then are peaceful democracies.
Just to keep us somewhere in the Land of Facts, was 80% of Germany reduced to a pile of rubble? My search found 20% of housing stock.

Also, while we are looking at your implied analogy, wasn't Hitler trying to take over all of Europe? The Palestinians seem okay with getting back the 43% of the British partitioning which was, erm, designated as theirs. Most seem okay with just getting back the WB, a safe corridor to Gaza, and removing illegal settlers. Not exactly Heute Palestinischland, Morgen die Welt!
 
Just to keep us somewhere in the Land of Facts, was 80% of Germany reduced to a pile of rubble? My search found 20% of housing stock.

Also, while we are looking at your implied analogy, wasn't Hitler trying to take over all of Europe? The Palestinians seem okay with getting back the 43% of the British partitioning which was, erm, designated as theirs. Most seem okay with just getting back the WB, a safe corridor to Gaza, and removing illegal settlers. Not exactly Heute Palestinischland, Morgen die Welt!
Господи, Теват, неужели вы думаете, что это всё из-за земли? 2 метра на кладбище всем найдут. Тут другое, тут просто бизнес со стороны главарей, использующих фанатиков в своих целях.
 
Just think pulling babies from the rubble. Covered in blood dust not really crying, just confused and in pain. A four year old knows nothing of Sharia or the Israel/ Palestine conflict.
It's a kid that wants his mum and sisters.

Personally? Israel should have bombed the shit out of known targets and Mossad should have taken out targets in Europe and elsewhere following 7.10.25.

They may have got some, not many but it would not have mattered. That's the knee jerk.

Next step should have been an international effort, bring the hostages back, the UN go in. NO attacks on civilians bring back the hostages.
Two nation state talks? Hostage prisoner swap.
Пин, как бы дико это не звучало, но этих детей нужно изымать из этих условий, и из этих семей, пока из них не сделали боевиков.
 
Just think pulling babies from the rubble. Covered in blood dust not really crying, just confused and in pain. A four year old knows nothing of Sharia or the Israel/ Palestine conflict.
It's a kid that wants his mum and sisters.
How about Israeli babies killed on Oct 7 and other terrorist incidents.
Personally? Israel should have bombed the shit out of known targets and Mossad should have taken out targets in Europe and elsewhere following 7.10.25.

They may have got some, not many but it would not have mattered. That's the knee jerk.
That's like swatting mosquitos, get a few but most survive.
Next step should have been an international effort, bring the hostages back, the UN go in. NO attacks on civilians bring back the hostages.
Two nation state talks? Hostage prisoner swap.
The UN is a toothless organization who can't prevent anything. You don't get any of this unless both sides agree, and they won't.
 
Also, while we are looking at your implied analogy, wasn't Hitler trying to take over all of Europe? The Palestinians seem okay with getting back the 43% of the British partitioning which was, erm, designated as theirs. Most seem okay with just getting back the WB, a safe corridor to Gaza, and removing illegal settlers. Not exactly Heute Palestinischland, Morgen die Welt!
Is that why the Palestinians chant "from the river to the sea", because they want only part. Wake up. They have always wanted the whole thing.
 
Hamburg: Roughly 75% destroyed.
Cologne: Left 61% to 90% in ruins.
Dresden: Near-totally destroyed.
Würzburg: 75% destroyed.
Total for Germany: 20%

Total for Gaza, so far: 80%

That was all I was pointing out. Germany was left with enough that it could rebuild and exist as a viable nation.
 
Is that why the Palestinians chant "from the river to the sea", because they want only part. Wake up. They have always wanted the whole thing.
Nope. But this fiction helps keep the Likudist militarism going full blast. And you may notice that fair apportionment of WB and EJ and Gaza, with a travel corridor, provides exactly that phrase. Which is what they were promised. Don't you think governments should keep their promises?
 
Total for Germany: 20%

Total for Gaza, so far: 80%

That was all I was pointing out. Germany was left with enough that it could rebuild and exist as a viable nation.
Germany was rebuilt, as was the rest of Western Europe with American help. Gaza can be rebuilt. Arab nations have enough to support that.
 
Last edited:
My God, Tevat, do you really think this is all about the land? They'll find two meters of space for everyone in the cemetery. This is something else entirely; it's simply a business venture by the ringleaders, exploiting fanatics for their own ends.
Of course it's about land. Palestinian people were farmers and crops were the cornerstone of their economy.
 
Nope. But this fiction helps keep the Likudist militarism going full blast. And you may notice that fair apportionment of WB and EJ and Gaza, with a travel corridor, provides exactly that phrase. Which is what they were promised. Don't you think governments should keep their promises?
You're naive if you really believe that, and, if you do, you sound like an anti-semite under the veil of anti-zionism.
 
Not going to bother continually pointing out the difference between antisemitism and anti Zionism. Cheap shots are not reasoned argument.
 
Not going to bother continually pointing out the difference between antisemitism and anti Zionism. Cheap shots are not reasoned argument.
I said sounds like. Not a cheap shot. And you don't seem to understand the origin of the term zionism. It described the Jews hope and desire to return to the Holy Land and Jerusalem. Nothing else. It has been distorted over the years. The original meaning is enshrined in the Israeli national anthem.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top