Why is there matter in universe ?
- Thread starter Dicart
- Start date
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Don't bother.
Dicart is a troll - sorry, a crow - who has demonstrated a very poor grasp of science and that he is only here to stroke his own ego by flogging his fanciful ideas.
He will demonstrate this momentarily.
Agree
One of the two, matter / antimatter, finished up with a bit more of itself hence was not eliminated. We live in the Universe made of the uneliminated stuff
WHY one lot of stuff became more than the other stuff is the question to ask
Agree
Wait a bit for the fanciful idea
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
false ?
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
Agree
One of the two, matter / antimatter, finished up with a bit more of itself hence was not eliminated. We live in the Universe made of the uneliminated stuff
WHY one lot of stuff became more than the other stuff is the question to ask
Agree
Wait a bit for the fanciful idea
Looks like the only thing you are good for is to wait that somebody that have used his brain give you something you can then repeat like a parrot.
What a pathetic life !
You on the other hand make up silly stuff.
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
Ok.
If a have a big dog, as big as i am.
Let say some like this one :
I am walking with my dog in the park (without a leash, because i am a bad boy) and my dog is running around.
We do some virtual fighting, he win i win, an even game.
Suddenly i realize that my dog has disappeared !
But, "where is my dog ?"
1. He must have disappeared due to the fight we did, and now i am weaker.
Se he is dead and i shortly escaped from the same fate, altougth i am seriously wounded.
2. He is lost.
I suppose 2 is true because i know we have equal strength.
Yes, i could use hypothesis 1, but it would need some complex new considerations (spining universe etc etc etc, i dont lack of imagination but i know that the simpliest is the smartest).
So, antimatter is lost.
Now, i try to find some scientist who did some serious work that could lead to this hypothesis :
Oh : Jean-Pierre Petit !
The one who pretend to have (perhaps) be in contact with some ET or at least have received some usefull informations that has permitted him to developp the JANUS univers Model (it is not a theory, it is a Model).
Very honest and smart guy if can give my opinion.
Here is the presentation of his work :
He speak very bad english, but i can not blame him. i write a very poor english too (i never speak english, it would sounds like AHHGrrrrrGHGGGG aaaaaaaaKKIO OMOHUU
)And yes, just to do the presentation of The Man.
He is the one who discovered the real nature of Black Holes.
There are no black holes, there are what he has named PlugStars (he has done the scientific demonstration of that)
Last edited:
I think your English is quite good, you do a good job of getting your point across.i write a very poor english too (i never speak english, it would sounds like AHHGrrrrrGHGGGG aaaaaaaaKKIO OMOHUU
Are you saying that there is large amounts of anti-matter in the universe? If that is what you are saying that does not seem true since there should be a lot of rather huge explosions going on when the anti-matter and matter encounter each other, which we do not see.
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
You should at leat view the video of Jean-Pierre Petit (JPP)
I ensure you that you will learn new things (you can also view other videos of JPP and you will understand why we think there are "back holes" (errors coming from the two Schwarzschild papers the scientists have not really understand (or never be aware of it because of the translation problem (95 years for the second paper of Schwarzchild)), but in fact (using the negativ mass concept), we have some special stars (he named them Plugstars) who can not create any singularity.
Here, he do the demonstration using Einstein's theory for the behaviour of the mass (me and my dog) :
JPP :
Any positiv mass concentration attract anaything (i mean positiv or negativ mass)
Conversly, negativ mass concentration reppels anything (reppels a positiv test mass or a negatv test mass).
+ against + : Attraction
- against - : Repulsion
+ against - : Runaway (the negativ mass,is attracted to the positiv mass while the positiv mass try to escape the negativ mass)
I agree... this looks very weird (runaway effect will be very difficult to be taken in account... it looks like a dog chasing around his own tail)
Now the JANUS Cosmological Model :
+ Against + : Attraction
- Against - : Attraction
- Against + (opposite mass) : Repulsion
And he doesent make some fantasy : It is some scientific deduction using Einstein's theory.
So.
Where is my dog ?
- Against + =====>>>>> REPULSION.
My dog is gone (there exists an other called "JANUS" univers close to our own).
PS: The link to the video (like the first one with the dog) should have taken in account the time stamp (i used the link at the position of the video option to create the link in youtube), but it looks like it is not taken in account in the post so add ?t=820 to the end of the link of the video)
Last edited:
I found the video way too tedious to watch. I skipped forward a bit and he began talking about negative mass. Negative mass is pseudoscience so at that point I stopped watching. The guy is not a physicist he is an engineer, I'm an engineer too, so I can tell you if you want to understand physics listen to physicist, not engineers.
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
You are a funny guy, for sure.
When Dirac discovered the possibility that there could be "antimatter", using the equations (like Mr Jean-Pierre Petit) he was wondering himsef if he should take it in account.
He dident say : OOhh i am doing pseudosience ? Mathematic say that but i can't believe it !
No. He only accepted the fact, doing nothing else than publishing his work.
By chance, someone observed something like antimatter (he dident know it was antimatter because he dident know the Dirac's equations).
But someone remembered Dirac's studies and tried : And if those observations could be related to Dirac's studies ?
Now, anyone knows that antimatter exists.
Pseudoscience ?
Haha, you are a funny guy.
Last edited:
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
So, the obvious answer is: antimatter is your dog.
Got it.
Anti-matter is real but negative mass is pseudoscience. Anti-matter and regular matter both are effected by gravity exactly the same, anti-matter is not negative mass.
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
Sure.
And you are Stan Laurel.
Dicart
Registered Senior Member
And how do you know that ?
Very very funny guy.
You already know all of that, and trying to answer thoses questions is ... pseudoscience (because it is what you think, and what you think is what science is... haha ).
So, can you explain me why scientists are actually doing some very expensive experimentation, trying to find out how matter and the antimatter react to gravity ?
They are doing pseudoscience too ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBAR_experiment
Because that is what mainstream physics says.
You have an odd sense of humor.
No of course not, but of course they are not looking for negative mass.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I'm not the one making the jokes.
You said the answer to matter is "obvious", and then literally told us a fanciful tale about a fight with a dog.
Is science a joke to you?
How do we know antimatter is real? Because we are making it in labs. Antiprotons are antimatter. Positrons are antimatter.
How do we know negative matter is pseudoscience? Because there is no evidence for it, either physical or theoretical. It is not explicitly ruled out by the physics we know, but then again, neither are other speculative particles such as tachyons.