continuing on from possible childhood poisoning from bleach/chlorine fumes
(while i was reading on something else)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...-likely-spread-flu-tonsillitis-pneumonia.html
NOTE i didnt read the article prior to posting it, im reading it now
unintentional chlorine fumes in a hospital/birthing home around new born babies, intense exposure as a small child etc...
companion that with a genetic predisposition for a allergic response or condition.
good quality tap water has chlorine in it.
can the poison response part of the brain code in trace chlorine (exposure)poisoning to a poison response to water taste as an allergic reaction ?
note important cultural difference in science methadology and statistical trial findings between the UK and the USA
The study emphasised that it was only observational, so no definitive conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect.
note this
In addition they didn't have any information on the use of other cleaning products used in the home, and only basic information was gathered on the use of bleach in the home, making it difficult to differentiate between exposure levels.
there seems to be a very odd leaning in the USA(it is not a heavy bias but it is a slight lean that i have seen over various studys)
the leaning is against market forces for liability rather than a scientific "putting the patient first" process.
soo it appears. while "putting the patient first" is not a scientific principal, the market force to remove liability by default of lack of admition of liability is not scientific.
these 2 things seem to get confused in the USA when money is the end result of the process from both ends(the patient and the entity deemed to be paying the bill)
oddly enough, one would expect that the patient pays the bill, so 'the issue' should only be around around the patient getting better.
however that is not the main driving force in the USA.
which is a signifigant reason why i think universal health care is critical for any 1st world country