Roosters for ever
Registered Senior Member
I couldn't argue with that, except to say at what scales we are actually talking about.eg: I'm more or less focusing on the observable universe scale, and I picture a state as detailed in postIt is my understanding that the universe is homogeneous at large scales, in the sense that if you pick two large-enough chunks of the universe at random, each one will contain approximately the same amount of matter, the same number of galaxies, and so on.
However, on the largest scales, the universe seems to consist of a cosmic "web" in which the "strands" contain lots of galaxies and matter, but the strands are separated by large voids. So, in that sense, the universe doesn't look homogeneous.
It is a bit of an ambiguous phrase, depending on the scale we look at. There are a few ways of interpreting it.
There is a question of why the entire universe isn't perfectly uniform, since we believe it expanded from a volume smaller than an atom, and there is no known reason why there would by any variation at all in that initial bubble.
But this is what we think it looks like now at the largest scale.
View attachment 7060
Sure, gravity pulled matter into clumps and tendrils, but where did those first inhomogeneities originate?
We sort of have to define the question first: at what scale are we talking about uneven distribution? Unfortunately, we can't leave that clarification to the OP who asked the question since they are not familiar with modern cosmology, or, apparently, physics.
