Ага, невежества, только вашего, а не моего.The onus is not on me to refute your nonsense.
Look at this latest nonsense, posted just a few minutes ago:
This doesn't need refutation; it's just more ign'ance.
Ага, невежества, только вашего, а не моего.The onus is not on me to refute your nonsense.
Look at this latest nonsense, posted just a few minutes ago:
This doesn't need refutation; it's just more ign'ance.
Believe it or not Olga I am not a super genius theoretical physicist or multi talented polymath experimentalist.Нет, не полезный. Вы описываете, но не объясняете. Это неправильно.
I try not to mislead you, just what I know, others will know more, you know who they are.Ага, невежества, только вашего, а не моего.
Неужели это Сократ? "Я знаю только то, что ничего не знаю".I try not to mislead you, just what I know, others will know more, you know who they are.![]()
Philosophy not my bag unless it's maths.Неужели это Сократ? "Я знаю только то, что ничего не знаю".
Любите математику? Тогда ответьте на вопрос о тетраэдрах.Philosophy not my bag unless it's maths.
Are you not happy with the answer?
Yes you did a thread on it. Are you done with this thread now? You are ok with Heisenberg?Любите математику? Тогда ответьте на вопрос о тетраэдрах.
More trolling. Reported for making stuff up.Yeah, ignorance, just yours, not mine.
It is a bit of an ambiguous phrase, depending on the scale we look at. There are a few ways of interpreting it.I do not agree that matter is unevenly distributed in space.

Гейзенберг в этом вопросе нам не помощник.Yes you did a thread on it. Are you done with this thread now? You are ok with Heisenberg?
Вы поговорите, Дэйв, а я вас внимательно послушаю. Вдруг, узнаю что-нибудь новое для себя?It is a bit of an ambiguous phrase, depending on the scale we look at. There are a few ways of interpreting it.
There is a question of why the entire universe isn't perfectly uniform, since we believe it expanded from a volume smaller than an atom, and there is no known reason why there would by any variation at all in that initial bubble.
But this is what we think it looks like now at the largest scale.
View attachment 7060
Sure, gravity pulled matter into clumps and tendrils, but where did those first inhomogeneities originate?
We sort of have to define the question first: at what scale are we talking about uneven distribution? Unfortunately, we can't leave that clarification to the OP who asked the question since they are not familiar with modern cosmology, or, apparently, physics.
But not from me? Pinball??Вы поговорите, Дэйв, а я вас внимательно послушаю. Вдруг, узнаю что-нибудь новое для себя?
Я ценю ваши старания, Пин. Наверняка вы сможете мне помочь в вопросах химиии и биологии.But not from me? Pinball??
I try my best but it is never enough![]()
That is like a slap in the face ...Я ценю ваши старания, Пин. Наверняка вы сможете мне помочь в вопросах химиии и биологии.
Нет, Пин. У меня и в мыслях не было вас обидеть. Но вы же сами сказали, что вы биолог.That is like a slap in the face ...
What is the reason?
Quantum fluctuations in the very early universe. See CMBR
If a model is old, it does not mean that it is wrong, necessarily.It's an old model, Pin. It doesn't explain anything. It's just a fantasy.