Probably you are looking for the Philosophy section but short answer...for me.Why does the universe exist?
Can cosmology explain?
To store stuff.Why does the universe exist?
It's a platform for god's tweets.Why does the universe exist?
Because.Why does the universe exist?
It can come up with ideas as to how it came about, almost all of them untestable by science.Can cosmology explain?
No, no, it's all to do with the enfolding and unfolding of functional mathematical potentials, inevitably leading to quantum consciousness. (See alternative theoriesBecause.
It can come up with ideas as to how it came about, almost all of them untestable by science.
Bohmian Mechanics.No, no, it's all to do with the enfolding and unfolding of functional mathematical potentials, inevitably leading to quantum consciousness. (See alternative theories)
There is no why, no motive. It was mathematically "necessary" that the universe would emerge from the mathematical pre-BB conditions. An example of "Necessity and Sufficiency"Why does the universe exist?
Can cosmology explain?
How high is up;?How the universe exist instead of does not exist?
why not there is something exists?why not there is nothing exists?
How do you know nothing is the initial state? What is your definition of nothing? Is it the base state? In quantum physics the base state is non-zero.because something comes from nothing,
nothing is the initial state.
High School's Physics says energy cannot be destroyed nor created, is it true?
Saint said: ↑ Why does the universe exist? Can cosmology explain?
Tegmark's MUH is:
Our external physical reality is a mathematical structure.[3] That is, the physical universe is not merely described by mathematics, but is mathematics (specifically, a mathematical structure).
Mathematical existence equals physical existence, and all structures that exist mathematically exist physically as well. Observers, including humans, are "self-aware substructures (SASs)". In any mathematical structure complex enough to contain such substructures, they "will subjectively perceive themselves as existing in a physically 'real' world".
The theory can be considered a form of Pythagoreanism or Platonism in that it proposes the existence of mathematical entities; a form of mathematical monism in that it denies that anything exists except mathematical objects; and a formal expression of ontic structural realism.
Tegmark claims that the hypothesis has no free parameters and is not observationally ruled out. Thus, he reasons, it is preferred over other theories-of-everything by Occam's Razor. Tegmark also considers augmenting the MUH with a second assumption, the
computable universe hypothesis (CUH), which says that the mathematical structure that is our external physical reality is defined by computable functions......more.