With the way you feel all perfectly placed with your "absolute" certainty, you must insult others quite often.
I do. But it's nothing to do with "absolute certainty".With the way you feel all perfectly placed with your "absolute" certainty, you must insult others quite often.
I do. But it's nothing to do with "absolute certainty".
Try re-reading your own posts: the vast majority is unfounded speculation, from which you appear to draw conclusions that you take as fact.
Do you have a PhD or something?
I do. But it's nothing to do with "absolute certainty".
Try re-reading your own posts: the vast majority is unfounded speculation, from which you appear to draw conclusions that you take as fact.
I concur.I could read and re-read them a thousand times and find nothing of interest
My unfounded speculation? Really?I have taken the best of your unfounded speculation as an "absolute" fact.
More inane drivel.From this point on from your own speculation your just denying yourself a gift you can give yourself. It is a title to be held with utmost pride a title someone else can place upon you. It is called the Ubermensche and I mean this without deception as truly one such as yourself who believes we are neither a slave nor a master of the universe is deserving of this title.
So start looking around at everything you can see in your proximity. Count your material possessions for their value as elements as opposed to objects of contention and desire. You may call me a liar, but you do not desire the same as I inquire. In which case it is useless to argue with a man who can't stand behind his own words.I concur.
Yes. When you stated no person has seen the extremely high energy levels present at the time of the BB, I believed you. The antimatter mold for the elements looks just the same upon speculation.My unfounded speculation? Really?
More inane drivel.
Without support.
An intro to metaphysics I guess ... so shoot.
Do you ever actually reply to the topic? Or comments addressed to you?So start looking around at everything you can see in your proximity. Count your material possessions for their value as elements as opposed to objects of contention and desire. You may call me a liar, but you do not desire the same as I inquire. In which case it is useless to argue with a man who can't stand behind his own words.
Um, that wasn't unfounded speculation. It was a fact.Yes. When you stated no person has seen the extremely high energy levels present at the time of the BB, I believed you.
You can say it with absolute certainty. But you'd be wrong.Within every possible viable point within the universe, there exists a particle small enough yet powerful enough to be its own universe. We can say this with absolute certainty.
Word salad. Meaningless, inane, unsupported drivel.Anything exists because recursive physical actions within the universe brought on the storage of dark energy's compounding information as a denser substance known as matter. The BB is when that compounded information ran against more compounded information. The universe is akin to a giant living thing sending information quickly around itself in order to carry out functions..
I do when considered relevant. Often your bothersome stances of complete doubt limit your ability to think clearly at times. You don't give in easily to the power of suggestion. This means you don't take advice well.Do you ever actually reply to the topic? Or comments addressed to you?
Not going to claim I put words in your mouth on that issue.. Now that is certainly interesting.Um, that wasn't unfounded speculation. It was a fact.
Well then I guess we should eliminate singularity out of all relativity as a concept. Since you are absolutely certain I am wrong.You can say it with absolute certainty. But you'd be wrong.
Alright then it exploded from no actual materials and just became what it is today.Word salad. Meaningless, inane, unsupported drivel.
Really? Examples please.Often your bothersome stances of complete doubt limit your ability to think clearly at times.
That would be incorrect. I consider advice, and make up my own mind as to its worth. Sometimes I take it, sometimes I don't.This means you don't take advice well.
Huh? You linked to a post that supposedly showed an unfounded speculation on my part. It didn't.Not going to claim I put words in your mouth on that issue.. Now that is certainly interesting.
Er right. What are you talking about?Well then I guess we should eliminate singularity out of all relativity as a concept.
That is one possible explanation.Alright then it exploded from no actual materials and just became what it is today
What "object"?How is this I'll just keep posting possibilities for you to decline until we find something deeper and experimentally viable within this conversation. Or we could make this object and see for ourselves the high energy levels.
wrong assumption.Huh? You linked to a post that supposedly showed an unfounded speculation on my part. It didn't.
Wrong.That is one possible explanation.
The one we haven't made, the whole point behind this exercise is for you to notice a single assimilated object that has been previously explained to "not be in existence" and at the very least try to imagine it.What "object"?
It's not an assumption. Keep trying.wrong assumption.
Actually, no.Wrong.
"Exercise"?The one we haven't made, the whole point behind this exercise is for you to notice a single assimilated object that has been previously explained to "not be in existence" and at the very least try to imagine it.
You said. Nobody has seen "it". I said we were and are part of it; therefore we have seen it and your left with an assumption. But still humanity is yet to make it for themselves. It is but a tool for showing how the universe works.It's not an assumption. Keep trying.
Though BB does answer the question it is still a word used to dodge the explanation of how out of nothing came the beautiful and mysterious appearance of matter. The BB explains how matter came about, but it does not mention the elementary principals involved with this type of occurrence taking place. Nothing is mentioned to have been the cause.Actually, no.
To see what it sees. I told you to measure the value of something. Something priceless."Exercise"?
Thinking inside the box. All 108 or so of them and start playing spot the difference. All access pass to anything and everything not immediately visible.What do you mean by "assimilated"?
Um, no. The assumption is yours. We haven't seen it. All you've done is make vague hand-wavy claims.You said. Nobody has seen "it". I said we were and are part of it; therefore we have seen it and your left with an assumption.
Again, incorrect. It has been shown that one possible cause was actually nothing. As stated.The BB explains how matter came about, but it does not mention the elementary principals involved with this type of occurrence taking place. Nothing is mentioned to have been the cause.
Aaand we're back to inane drivel.To see what it sees. I told you to measure the value of something. Something priceless.
Thinking inside the box. All 108 or so of them and start playing spot the difference. All access pass to anything and everything not immediately visible.
Meaningless in regards to the resulting chit chat.