Why do only females select males?

Oh then there are the egg layers were the males are required to carry the offspring in there mouth or produce a substance that the babies eat or build the nest and sit on it (in the case of birds) or 100 of other ways where the female is irrelevant after producing eggs
 
The Emperor Penguin is interesting in that it is another species where the male contributes greatly to the raising of the young.

Mate selection seems to be by mutual agreement.

The penguins start courtship in March or April, when the temperature can be as low as −40 °C (−40 °F). A lone male gives an ecstatic display, where it stands still and places its head on its chest before inhaling and giving a courtship call for 1–2 seconds; it then moves around the colony and repeats the call. A male and female then stand face to face, with one extending its head and neck up and the other mirroring it; they both hold this posture for several minutes. Once in pairs, couples waddle around the colony together, with the female usually following the male. Before copulation, one bird bows deeply to its mate, its bill pointed close to the ground, and its mate then does the same.

The adult Emperor Penguin stands up to 122 cm (48 in) tall. The weight ranges from 22.7 to 45.4 kg (50 to 100 lb) and varies by sex, with males weighing more than females.[5] The weight also varies by season, as both male and female penguins lose substantial mass while raising hatchlings and incubating eggs. A male Emperor penguin must withstand the Antarctic cold for more than two months to protect his eggs from extreme cold. During this entire time he doesn't eat a thing. Most male penguins will lose about 12 kg (26 lb) while they wait for their babies to hatch.[6] The mean weight of males at the start of the breeding season is 38 kg (84 lb) and that of females is 29.5 kg (65 lb). After the breeding season this drops to 23 kg (51 lb) for both sexes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Penguin
 
Asguard:

James that's HUMANS, who has the greatest investment in the sea horse community? or the black widow spider one (where in order to mate the male has to be EATEN)

My comments were not restricted to humans.

That this is not a universal rule for all species was discussed prior to your post. I suggest you read the thread.
 
I like how the black widow spider does it...female is bigger, stronger and eats him afterwards.

She doesn't have to fear rape..doesn't have to engage in a hundred safety behaviours...doesn't have to wonder if her sleeveless shirt will attract a rapist before reflecting that rapists don't even look, primarily, for visual attractiveness.

And then she doesn't have to put up with his emotional problems afterwards, either. Hehee.
 
I like how the black widow spider does it...female is bigger, stronger and eats him afterwards.

She doesn't have to fear rape..doesn't have to engage in a hundred safety behaviours...doesn't have to wonder if her sleeveless shirt will attract a rapist before reflecting that rapists don't even look, primarily, for visual attractiveness.

And then she doesn't have to put up with his emotional problems afterwards, either. Hehee.
I wonder if the male just lies there, or does he put up a fight.
Is it built in to their genome to accept this brutality? :mad:
 
I like how the black widow spider does it...female is bigger, stronger and eats him afterwards.

She doesn't have to fear rape..doesn't have to engage in a hundred safety behaviours...doesn't have to wonder if her sleeveless shirt will attract a rapist before reflecting that rapists don't even look, primarily, for visual attractiveness.

And then she doesn't have to put up with his emotional problems afterwards, either. Hehee.

A picture is worth a thousand words, 'tis often said....

blackwmale.jpg
 
Myth: When black widow spiders mate, the female always kills and eats the male.

Fact: This myth (which is not totally false, but very far from true) is believed even by scientists, and can be found in many ecology textbooks! It's depressing; the authors are obviously copying each other and have never actually watched black widows mate in the field.

To understand the facts about black widow mating, you must first understand that there are many different species worldwide in the black-widow group (the genus Latrodectus), and three different black widow species in the United States alone, two in the east and one in the west. These species do not all behave alike. Moreover, in the past most observations of mating took place in laboratory cages, where males could not escape.

The only known Latrodectus species in which mate cannibalism in nature is the rule, not the exception, are in the Southern Hemisphere. Of U.S. species, mate cannibalism occurs sometimes in Latrodectus mactans, the eastern (southern) black widow, but most males survive to mate another day. In the other two black species, including the western black widow L. hesperus (only species west of Kansas), mate cannibalism has never been observed in the wild!

http://www.burkemuseum.org/spidermyth/myths/blackwidow.html
 
Does she take more than one mate to get a decent feed? :)

I think the male provides a large amount of nutrition to put in the eggs. What I wonder is, does the male become more nutritious [by some biochemical processes] once he is ready to mate?
 
I love how you people skip straight over other peoples posts and in doing so look like idiots.

aaqucnaona, scheherazade already busted that myth and I can tell you there is no cannibalistism in the video
 
aaqucnaona, scheherazade already busted that myth and I can tell you there is no cannibalistism in the video

When did I write about black widows? :bugeye:

Anyway, I have a question [post #33].

Ps. This also applies to mantises, right?
 
When did I write about black widows? :bugeye:

Anyway, I have a question [post #33].

Ps. This also applies to mantises, right?

Have you noticed that in the bug world, females seem to dominate the males in one way or another. By comparison human females are looking real good.:D
 
Last edited:
Myth: When black widow spiders mate, the female always kills and eats the male.

Fact: This myth (which is not totally false, but very far from true) is believed even by scientists, and can be found in many ecology textbooks! It's depressing; the authors are obviously copying each other and have never actually watched black widows mate in the field.

To understand the facts about black widow mating, you must first understand that there are many different species worldwide in the black-widow group (the genus Latrodectus), and three different black widow species in the United States alone, two in the east and one in the west. These species do not all behave alike. Moreover, in the past most observations of mating took place in laboratory cages, where males could not escape.

The only known Latrodectus species in which mate cannibalism in nature is the rule, not the exception, are in the Southern Hemisphere. Of U.S. species, mate cannibalism occurs sometimes in Latrodectus mactans, the eastern (southern) black widow, but most males survive to mate another day. In the other two black species, including the western black widow L. hesperus (only species west of Kansas), mate cannibalism has never been observed in the wild!
Nevertheless, it is observed in some cases, quite common in the Australian Redback, and it deserves an explanation.
I think the male provides a large amount of nutrition to put in the eggs. What I wonder is, does the male become more nutritious [by some biochemical processes] once he is ready to mate?
Its worth noting that the male appeares to sacrifice himslef to the female by somersaulting into her jaws.

Contribution to the future egg is a common proposed theory, but I am not sure. Consider the below paper. For some reason, I cant copy and paste the text, so you will have to read it to see the finding in the authors words.

The author found that the consumption of a single male does not increase egg number or mass, after all the male is only in mass, a fraction the size of a female or her eggs.

He did find however, that males that were eaten, copulated far longer than a male that wasnt eaten. This is beacuse copulation continued during consumption and that this continued copulation is the payoff. In addition females were less likely to copulate with another male afterwards (Iam not sure why this is, perhaps she isnt hungry), a further payoff to the eaten male. Weigh this against what the author discusses in the concluding paparagraphs, in that the males have a low chance of surviving in the wild while trying to find another female, therefore it is not actually sacrifing much in quantitative terms.

https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/1009/2/Andrade96.pdf
 
Last edited:
James that's HUMANS, who has the greatest investment in the sea horse community? or the black widow spider one (where in order to mate the male has to be EATEN)

Setting aside the behavioural costs, the production of eggs is still energetically more expensive than sperm. But who does the choosing in the sea horse community?
 
Back
Top