and asking for open discussion.
Well, you
are getting feedback on your ideas, even if it isn't quite the kind you hoped for.
We can't have an open discussion about your unsupportd personal views. This is how it goes:
Large-scale long-term mining of mineral resources, destruction of historical relics and disturbance of ancient bronze formations across Asia are the root causes of the collapsing planetary barrier and geomagnetic chaos.
Are they? Why should we believe you?
There are so many questions that might have been answered
before you brought your ideas to the public:
What's a "planetary barrier"? Is this something you've made up?
How is it collapsing?
What is geomagnetic "chaos"?
What historical relics?
Why would relics have any impact on planetary magneto-geology?
Bronze is man-made. And it's only been around for a few millennia. I thought we were talking about planetary-scale geo-magnetism?
1. Depletion of mineral veins cuts off the system’s energy supply
Does it? Why should we take your word on that?
What system? What energy? What supply?
Mass extraction of rare earth, precious metals and deep energy ores directly drains the power source of the crystal grid system, triggering a sharp decline in global resonance intensity.
Does it?
What is a crystal grid system?
What is the power source?
What is global resonance intensity?
Are these terms scientifically well-defined? Do they evne have a wiki entry? Did you gather them from some crystallography website? Given to you by a chatbot? Made up yourself?
2. Destruction of bronze formations disables vein-locking anchors
Does it?
You see how problematic this is?
We have a saying around here: attributed to Wolfgang Pauli: you're "not even wrong".
In this case, it means your ideas are so vague, rhetorical and unsupported, they can't be right
or wrong. They're just not formulated enough to say anything about them at all.
You have a
lot of work to do.