esbo is fulll of shit and is therefore a container. Consequently my post is wholly on topic.
That cracked me up...
esbo is fulll of shit and is therefore a container. Consequently my post is wholly on topic.
@others
Do you think a potted plant on top of a table counts as a container?
I've just put an old round wooden table in my garden,
and put a potted plant on it
I think having raised it, it looks much nicer than it did on the ground.
What do you think.
OK, esbo, screw your plants. How about you give us that detailed take on why leaves are green and what is wrong with all the detailed, fulsome explanations you have had so far.
Or are we all accepting that you are just a despicable, narrow minded little troll, who not only won't answer , but lacks the ability to answer. Oops, did I say that out loud? mea culpa.
I found your message offensive so I reported you.
Just to let you know.
Please don't do it again.
I will go through it in more detail shortly.
For which I received a warning. As I said to James R it is clear neither of you have a sense of humour.I found your message offensive so I reported you.
Just to let you know.
Please don't do it again.
For which I received a warning. As I said to James R it is clear neither of you have a sense of humour.
You seem to feel it is not offensive to lie repeatedly on the forum, but get upset when someone accurately portrays your character in robust words. Tough. Live with it, or start to behave with some honesty in your posting style.
“ Originally Posted by esbo
I will go through it in more detail shortly.”
I don't believe I called you a troll. I did say you were full of shit. You appear to be, by some definitions, a troll. It is no more offensive to call you a troll than it is to call others 'enthusiastic amateurs', or 'post-graduate researchers'. All are objective terms that describe a persons behaviour, interests, or occupation.Calling me a troll is offensive and against the rules whether I am a troll or not,
You clearly stated in an earlier post that you would give an explanation shortly. You have refused to do so subsequently, despite multiple requests and reminders from several members. Therefore your initial statement was a lie.I will give you an explanation if and when I feel like it, I am under no obligation to give you one.
Then you should not have lied about being ready to post an explanation shortly.You won't find many universities giving free courses so I do not know if I should give away my theory for nothing, .
And there is no need for you to lie and to refuse to answer simple questions and neglect to honour commitments that you have made. When I see such actions I believe the case is made: an attack on those actions is wholly appropriate until those actions are stopped and apologies issued.There is no need for you to attack people in the way you do ie name calling and being generally abusive..
Because you are lying and refusing to honour your commitments. Do you think lies should be celebrated and dishonourable behaviour praised?I have not attacked anyone on here in that manner so I fail to see why you feel the need to.
I do not expect people to be generous to me. I expect people to be honest and I expect them to apply the principles of the scientific method in a positive manner. If they chose, instead, to lie, to waffle, to refuse to engage in honest debate, then I shall point this out.If you expect people to be generous to you then you ought to be more respectful and civil.