you would take it that way.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FUCKING RELIABLE SORCE.
get off your ass and find another one
Dude, chill out.
you would take it that way.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FUCKING RELIABLE SORCE.
get off your ass and find another one
You don't HAVE to listen. But it's the only system we use, so either use it, or don't. It's as simple as that. Unfortunately for you, there is no other choice.
Note: This is not meant to sound rude. Just straight-forward.
you would take it that way.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FUCKING RELIABLE SORCE.
get off your ass and find another one
You are socialist but not socially,right?
now youre just trolling.
that means we are forced to use it.
Not necessarily true.WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FUCKING RELIABLE SORCE.
Give an example of when Capitalists actually forced someone to abide by it.
What do capitalists say about Coal Mine owners whom also owned the land, owned the stores, and basically owned there workers because everything was company property? The fact that they also hired criminals to physically stop the creation of worker's unions? This happened in America "the birth place of capitalism."
NOTE; www.wikipeida.com is NOT a reliable source. Please do not use it when refering people to refrences or deffinitions.
Source please.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_busting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldwin-Felts_Detective_Agency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Matewan
"The most common complaint of the miners, however, concerned their pay, and the total control which the companies had over their financial well-being. Most mining towns were "company towns." The coal company owned the land. They built, rented, or sold the houses to their workers. If the miners quit work or went on strike, the company could evict them from their homes. They often forced workers to buy at "company stores," where credit might be more readily available, but prices were higher. Companies sometimes paid in "scrip," which was taken in trade only at the company store. At times, men who refused to buy from the company store were dismissed. Miners were usually paid monthly in the early days, with the company holding two weeks' back pay. Thus, miners who quit often lost two weeks' pay. Miners also had the expense of getting their tools sharpened, and they had to buy oil for their lamps which provided the only light underground."
http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/earlyday.htm
Theres some.
But I have to point out, that all economic/political systems can be corrupted. The examples you've shown are indeed evidence of times when Capitalism was corrupted by power-hungry men. But may I say that Socialism was also corrupted by power-hungry men in 1922. The year Stalin came to power in Russia and formed the USSR.
Touche.
But I have to point out, that all economic/political systems can be corrupted. The examples you've shown are indeed evidence of times when Capitalism was corrupted by power-hungry men. But may I say that Socialism was also corrupted by power-hungry men in 1922. The year Stalin came to power in Russia and formed the USSR.
I can agree to this, even though I also don't really agree with Lenin either.
I think the example beat theory.(For a theorem to be invalid enough, one counterexample)
I have lived in socialism and I know.
Also great majority of socialist states dropped to socialism.
Socialists dropped to Socialism?
I think the example beat theory.(For a theorem to be invalid enough, one counterexample)
I have lived in socialism and I know.
Also great majority of socialist states dropped to socialism.
So, for problems of capitalism, socialism is not viable solution.
We remain to try to correct and not to replace capitalism with socialism.
Regardless of position (whether your Socialist or Capitalist) this sort of argumentation is silly.