Hi Forrest, I stood up for you in the Scientific Theories and Reality thread, and am sure you have a lot of knowledge and interesting perspectives. My first question: If you feel you want to offer us your answers freely, acknowledging that we may not agree with your answers, and alerting us to the fact that your answers may be "alternative science", ... what kind of thread do you think I am conduction here if not alternative, lol?
Second question: Why haven't you read posts #414 to #433? If you had you would know my questions. Answer any of them as you see fit.
Anyway, welcome to the thread and please feel free to contribute your perspective on the various topics. But be alerted, if you have questions I'm sure we are just as eager to answer them with our alternative views as you are to answer ours. This thread should be perfect for you.
Thanks for that. I have no intent of highjacking this or any thread so you let me know if you would like to see my related conversations in its own thread.
Thanks, I just perused this thread so you have given me direction. OK postings 414 and 433.
paragraph posting 414:
......In one formidable sentence, my hobby-model, called the Infinite Spongy Universe (ISU), which introduces Quantum Wave Cosmology (QWC), and which implies that the mainstream theories might be inconsistent, incompatible, and/or incomplete, can be called a steady state, multiple big bang arena model, that defeats entropy via the process of Arena Action on the large scale level which features multiple big bang arenas making up the landscape of the greater universe, without the implied "something from nothing" beginning of General Relativity (GR), and where, on the smallest scale at the foundational level, the process of Quantum Action establishes the presence of particles and motion under the Hidden Variables Interpretation (HVI) of Quantum Mechanics (QM), with local reality and without faster than light communication between particles, noting that both action processes feature the same potentially infinite gravitational wave energy traversing the aether medium of space, and both processes are described in the context of two major opposing forces, hypothetical energy density equalization, and hypothetical quantum gravity, while the whole model complies with the "Perfect Cosmological Principle" which states that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic in space and time, i.e. in this view the universe looks the same everywhere, the same as it always has and always will....
I like quantum wave theory since it implies and aether, which I agree with. It also can answer the hidden variable question, the actions of the aether are the hidden variables of Quantum Theory. I think there is a simple answer to quantum entanglement relating to the supposed communication of entangled particles. Here is my explanation:
Electrons, for example, have opposite spins when they are within the same orbital ring of an atom. In an aether model, as you suggest, there is aether waves and by this "communication" between the electrons. When quantum entangling electrons on needs to bring them very close together like electrons in the same orbit. When you do this, aether theory would say there would be communication between the electrons and there indeterminate state of spin would then be determined, even though one would not know the spin of each individual electron you would know that there spins have been determined by entanglement and will be opposite each other. You know send them off in different directions and if they are not interfered with, surprise, one will have the opposite spin to the other. A similar principle applies with photons, entanglement determines compatible states via the aether.
"hypothetical energy density equalization, and hypothetical quantum gravity"
Energy density equalization seems appropriate in an aether model, but I prefer a pushing model of gravity involving aether flow.
Now for posting #433, I think you meant 434.
.......The cause of gravity is the quintessential topic that weaves its way all throughout my hobby model. In that regard, I have contemplated the vacuum energy density, also known to me as the cosmological constant, when speaking in terms of Big Bang Theory.
Vacuum energy density is the equivalent of the force of energy density equalization in my hobby-model. It is what causes high energy density space to equalize with low energy density space. The terms "high/low energy density space" refer to the gravitational wave energy gradient of the medium of space under consideration.
It follows that the gravitational wave energy density gradient of the local medium of space hosting a clock determines the rate at which the clock will measure the passing of time. My hypothesis is that the rate at which particles function is governed by the gravitational wave energy density in that vicinity.
Accelerating a clock relative to a rest frame will increase the gravitational wave energy density in which the clock is operating, and thus slow down the rate that it functions as it measures the passing of time. Thus time is not variable, the rate at which clocks measure time varies relative to the gravitational wave energy density of the environment in which the clock is functioning.
Vacuum energy density in my model can be viewed on the cosmological scale as in the big bang arena landscape of the greater universe, and also as it pertains to the equalization of gravitational wave energy density at any given locality within the medium of space, right down to my hypothesized "foundational" level, where quantum gravity plays out in continuous gravitational wave action, and where standing wave particles emerge as any big bang arena begins to expand.
Gravity and energy density equalization are opposing forces in my model. In that expanding environment, as particles form they are imparted with "separation momentum", but particles in close quarters move in the direction of the net highest directional source of energy density in the surrounding gravitational wave energy gradient of space. Thus gravity causes particle clumping even as the energy density is declining due to expansion, and that is gravity occurring within an expanding big bang arena , so I say. .......
I think we agree that the concept of space warping to produce gravity, is not the best theory. Your model of gravity waves seems reasonable to me, but not as a pulling force. A mechanical model would seem to require a pushing force, if your model is mechanical, rather than a classical force. Also, to date they have not detected any such waves but that doesn't mean anything in that they haven't realized the existence of the aether as yet either
Vacuum energy is simple in an aether model. The energy observed is the energy produced by interactions of the aether with itself, and with particulates within it, both known and unknown. As to the Big Bang arena, I think the BB model will be replaced within 20 years, I hope
Did I miss anything?
BTW, thanks for coming to my defense in the Scientific Theories and Reality thread. I stir up a lot of emotions when proposing that mainstream models may be wrong
