Yeah, starting around 2005, the rate of installation of solar-PV has outstripped any of the predictions for it. There are now massive non-subsidized utility scale solar farms that are winning bids at under 2 cents/kwhr. I think that's due to three things:billvon, I had the impression that funding RE was more empty gesturing - appeasing the loudest voices on the climate problem, that tended to be 'green' (and reinforcing perceptions the climate issue was about appeasing unreasonable 'green' demands) - than any genuine, deep commitment to decarbonising. But I admit to being cynical.
Perhaps not a surprise that RE could be made to work at low cost to those involved in trying - scientists, engineers - or even that for a lot of people it looked more genuine than it did to me, much as I wanted it to work, but to those funding it, who almost certainly had energy industry experts telling them such options wouldn't work it must have been unexpected that RE would become the most built kind of energy by the early 2020's.
1) Pure research funding that enabled production of higher efficiency cells
2) Funding for installations that caused a larger market to appear, and drove efficiencies of scale
3) After the inflection point (payback in under 10 years) natural demand for the "free energy" available from solar-PV.

