mirror man
Registered Member
Ever heard of a Higher National Diploma? well, it ain't a PHD , but I did forward mirror music concepts as part of my modules, and the head of music was rather impressed. Are you a head of music?
What the .........
- Thread starter QuarkHead
- Start date
- Status
Ever heard of a Higher National Diploma? well, it ain't a PHD , but I did forward mirror music concepts as part of my modules, and the head of music was rather impressed. Are you a head of music?
mirror man
Registered Member
The connection is with a thing called the Merkaba. And it is not numerology that leads to that connection, it is well established nature laws manifest in nature. One is busy being aware of one side of the mirror, that no worth is giving to the other side of the mirror. And I don't mean a physical mirror, as you know. I mean the kind of structures we have come to associate within nature...sound and harmonics, Phi ratios, Fibonacci numbers, number as a system not as in numerology, spin, matter, frequency, torus, Pi, colour, all of nature's phenomena has been seen in its mirror guise, and it's opened up a different result. It has even tied the results in with the I-ching as binary, Mayan calendar grid, basic astrological chart (not personality readings). It's given insight that at the heart of these natural cyclic phenomena and building blocks within nature is a connection with a Merkaba. The people must have given it its meaning, by associating it with consciousness and the contrary spinning cycles of light in unity, for a good reason. And THAT is the exact result when seeing the two sides of the mentioned structres through the mirror in unity, the emergence of two triangular flows of frequency that eqaute to the same function as the Merkaba. Plot these cyclic frequencies on a circle and they even match the symbol's sign. And not just one experiment, but dozens of different approaches yield that very same result.
I do have this right to claim it points toward consciounsess, because that is what the symbol's meaning is. It isn't just a symbol. This Merkaba is the unity of the masculine/feminine aspects. It sounds VERY scientific to me. But at a price. You will have to ponder that after all your life spent thinking there is no consciousness becuase science can't quanitfy it, and it's all about evolution starting up life without any need for a Creator to instigate it, that actually science wasn't using the tools available.
I do have this right to claim it points toward consciounsess, because that is what the symbol's meaning is. It isn't just a symbol. This Merkaba is the unity of the masculine/feminine aspects. It sounds VERY scientific to me. But at a price. You will have to ponder that after all your life spent thinking there is no consciousness becuase science can't quanitfy it, and it's all about evolution starting up life without any need for a Creator to instigate it, that actually science wasn't using the tools available.
Actually he isn't the musician. This phoney "mirror man" is posting posts I made at physorg, that belong amongst the other stuff they were posting back at me at the time. His chums MPants and Anima Kulture seem to have hopped onto the bandwagon as well. Physorg seem to think this "mirror man" has every right to use my posts and paste them here.
You'll find this "mirror man" knows nothing about music theory at all. Ask him what the mirror tritone equates to in an E Mixolydian scale, then put through the triangle of keys until a mirror scale emerges. Then to take the arp scale partners through the circle of tones, until from a six note composition emerges a set of mirror transpositions and unconventional chord clusters.
Over to you "mirror man". You can confer with your pal Mpants.
Can you remind me about the emails Reiku?
mirror man
Registered Member
Well firstly, whatever my work is I would like to see you justify your attitude.
If you think you have a case against what I am claiming then you should present it, not keep throwing up smokescreens. Your way is the way of the cowardly wanker.
I'm pretty sure I play guitar better than you, and have more common sense than you, and am less cruel than you, and will have the respect of more people than you. I'm honored to have given a little meaning to your miserable little life dude.
I'll do everyone a favor and ignore your sorry little ass from now on. Life is precious, and you are a waste of it.
That's right Occidental, you are a waste of space. And why post a post I made to some troll over at physorg in reply to my earlier question to you? Is this the kind of respect you are willing to show sciforums and its members?
Here's another mirror music question for you. Can you tell me the new mirror scale that emerges when both forms of the A Melodic Minor scale have retrograde inversion applied to them?
I'm asking you questions I know that you won't find answers from the posts I made at physorg. One can be 100% sure you can't provide these answers using your own brain.
Here's another mirror music question for you. Can you tell me the new mirror scale that emerges when both forms of the A Melodic Minor scale have retrograde inversion applied to them?
I'm asking you questions I know that you won't find answers from the posts I made at physorg. One can be 100% sure you can't provide these answers using your own brain.
mirror man
Registered Member
You are entitled to your scornful attitude. I'm going to continue sharing the findings, and I think it is a question of sharing it will the kind of scientist that is not a rejector of spirit. Or the kind of scientists that refuse to acknowledge a thing because it doesn't fit into conventional views of what science is. It does fit, and it also includes a spiritual implication. I know some of your have spent your lives thinking the mechanical is the only truth, so really there won't be much common ground here at the moment. I happen to think your attitude here speaks for itself. You behave more like some catholic inquisition of the fifteenth century, except that there is not even spirit within it.
mirror man
Registered Member
One last time. The process used throughout the book is according to scientific method. There is no instillation of opinion. A cycle is a cycle, ratios are ratios, and they have all been proven to exist. Any evidence unearthed from the mirroring process is scientific. There is evidence that only the one result is possible when the duality of these natural cycles are exposed and then united at the perfectly symmetrical point between them.
The results always point to triangular frequencies, coming out in sets of two, that form a symbol associated with balance and consciousness. It is not associated by scientists because scientists are not aware of the process by which that association may be made.
If you find it upsetting that such evidence should exist, and deny the connection, that is your problem for now. I have proved the connection, and it is a connection that can be proved by anyone, given the facts of the matter. As I am satisifed that this connection exists, because I have looked at the matter involved, it leads to the desire to use the data in ways that is normally a question of using ones imagination, that is, experimenting with resonators and other things regarding the combination of certian frequencies, all related to the data unearthed.
This symbol you wonder about is there, and no mystical process has been involved in unearthing it. An uncanny coincidence perhaps if it was limited to only appearing within musical scales, but it actually appears in systems that are apparently unrelated. The mystical connection you are referring to is the same symbol that had been used for thousands of years denoting balance of the forces. The one I refer to is the reuslt that mirroring natural cycles provides. Both are exactly the same symbol, both denote points of balance. If you are not willing to make a connection here, when dealing with frequency and cyclic events, again that's your problem.
And finally, ok, scientists like you (if you are) are going to refuse the information on your own grounds. You jump up and down and call it numerology, new age and everything else. You are free to show your maturity by calling me names, I enjoy a bit of a piss take too, little boys getting cheeky together. It's highly amusing. What lovely growd-ups you guys are.;-)
The results always point to triangular frequencies, coming out in sets of two, that form a symbol associated with balance and consciousness. It is not associated by scientists because scientists are not aware of the process by which that association may be made.
If you find it upsetting that such evidence should exist, and deny the connection, that is your problem for now. I have proved the connection, and it is a connection that can be proved by anyone, given the facts of the matter. As I am satisifed that this connection exists, because I have looked at the matter involved, it leads to the desire to use the data in ways that is normally a question of using ones imagination, that is, experimenting with resonators and other things regarding the combination of certian frequencies, all related to the data unearthed.
This symbol you wonder about is there, and no mystical process has been involved in unearthing it. An uncanny coincidence perhaps if it was limited to only appearing within musical scales, but it actually appears in systems that are apparently unrelated. The mystical connection you are referring to is the same symbol that had been used for thousands of years denoting balance of the forces. The one I refer to is the reuslt that mirroring natural cycles provides. Both are exactly the same symbol, both denote points of balance. If you are not willing to make a connection here, when dealing with frequency and cyclic events, again that's your problem.
And finally, ok, scientists like you (if you are) are going to refuse the information on your own grounds. You jump up and down and call it numerology, new age and everything else. You are free to show your maturity by calling me names, I enjoy a bit of a piss take too, little boys getting cheeky together. It's highly amusing. What lovely growd-ups you guys are.;-)
mirror man
Registered Member
You not only don't know whether what you say about me is true, but you have not even attmpted to read any of my work. On the other hand, I am doing rather well at the moment having taken my work to other places, getting reviews and making positive inroads to sharing what I consider to being a valid argument for what I have claimed in the book.
So, if a wanker like you wants to throw his uneducated scorn that's you business. I have made a valid claim to show that when one opens up the mirror side of well known formulas there is only one consistent result that emerges. The result ties together the mirror sides with the emergence of two triangles of frequencies. It is only these that emerge when talking about uniting both sides of the mirror according to well known cyclic laws within nature. As you know these include the Phi/Golden Mean, Fibonacci numbers, prime number constants, music scale and modal theory, Lambdoma/Harmonic phenomena, and other intrinsic properties of nature.
These triangles of frequencies cycle infinitely. Plot the triangles on a circle and one gets this Merkaba. That is what is uniting both sides of the mirror as shown throughout the book. When one deduces that this is a Merkaba structre existing within the cycles, and studies the idea of what a Merkaba represents, there is no conflict whatsoever with the results shown in my book. That has to be grounds for making a valid claim. It has as much right to be made as any of the theories that are passed as science. Not only that, but I have dozens of experiments designed to put the data to use.
So, if a wanker like you wants to throw his uneducated scorn that's you business. I have made a valid claim to show that when one opens up the mirror side of well known formulas there is only one consistent result that emerges. The result ties together the mirror sides with the emergence of two triangles of frequencies. It is only these that emerge when talking about uniting both sides of the mirror according to well known cyclic laws within nature. As you know these include the Phi/Golden Mean, Fibonacci numbers, prime number constants, music scale and modal theory, Lambdoma/Harmonic phenomena, and other intrinsic properties of nature.
These triangles of frequencies cycle infinitely. Plot the triangles on a circle and one gets this Merkaba. That is what is uniting both sides of the mirror as shown throughout the book. When one deduces that this is a Merkaba structre existing within the cycles, and studies the idea of what a Merkaba represents, there is no conflict whatsoever with the results shown in my book. That has to be grounds for making a valid claim. It has as much right to be made as any of the theories that are passed as science. Not only that, but I have dozens of experiments designed to put the data to use.
- Status