You're not talking about Nostradamus here are you?
Science and him?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What the .........
- Thread starter QuarkHead
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Science and him?
Is it giving you a big hard on "mirror man"? Coming onto a forum and deceiving the members about who you really are? Are you so bored with life that you need to spend your time living someone else's life, trying to make them look bad? It's an easy deception to rectify. But you just carry on mr "mirror man".
T
thislittlepiggy
Guest
Mirror man and mirrorPI might be the same schizoid. What mirror man is saying sounds like a waste of time named Boneidol at Pysorg who is mirrorPI here. Read Science:Truth or Fraud at Physorg, Boneidol's work.
Confusing? You aint seen nothing yet. Wait till he starts his shiet here.
Confusing? You aint seen nothing yet. Wait till he starts his shiet here.
mirror man
Registered Member
Mirror man and mirrorPI might be the same schizoid. What mirror man is saying sounds like a waste of time named Boneidol at Pysorg who is mirrorPI here. Read Science:Truth or Fraud at Physorg, Boneidol's work.
Confusing? You aint seen nothing yet. Wait till he starts his shiet here.
Well I can see you don't care about the deeper questions regarding consciousness. Getting to be a subject that occupies a lot more people's thoughts nowadays.
Wouldn't it be cool when people finally realize how it pops up into existence?
Then you may even know why you think and why you are. I am going to seek to conduct experiments based on the frequency relationships, shown throughout my book. I ask if there is a case to be made , because of a similarity with a Merkaba. Consciousness symbol. The reason I ask this question is based on the results shown in the book. What you are offering is nothing but a subjective reaction.
mirror man
Registered Member
There is evidence that information swaps from one side of the mirror to the other. Information is important. Information can be carried in objects. High lazer energy , tuned to the frequencies that align with the balance area, before the swap, can be another area to investigate.
mirror man
Registered Member
I ask if a case can be made for such a thing. And the case is based on actual data.
I'll predict this for you, so you can forget as soon as you've probably read it. From what I am finding out, the case I intuitively started making, is gaining shape, and I feel rather confident that it will be delivered as something tangible far quicker than any string will manifest from the minds of the theorists. There are many other people reaching similar conclusions of their own, and when they start coming together, as these things inevitably do, a clearer case for the nature of consciousness will be the result.
As always, it just takes longer than it could, due to the stagnation and politics of the governing body at the time.
But what I find the most pleasing aspect is that even a young teen will be able to understand the basic intrinsic nature of the universe and the role of consciousness within it. The future belongs to the people. Sorry theorists and complication merchants.
I'll predict this for you, so you can forget as soon as you've probably read it. From what I am finding out, the case I intuitively started making, is gaining shape, and I feel rather confident that it will be delivered as something tangible far quicker than any string will manifest from the minds of the theorists. There are many other people reaching similar conclusions of their own, and when they start coming together, as these things inevitably do, a clearer case for the nature of consciousness will be the result.
As always, it just takes longer than it could, due to the stagnation and politics of the governing body at the time.
But what I find the most pleasing aspect is that even a young teen will be able to understand the basic intrinsic nature of the universe and the role of consciousness within it. The future belongs to the people. Sorry theorists and complication merchants.
Lots of words.
Little actual content.
Zero evidence.
You have given no clue whatsoever as what you're talking about, other than, possibly, that you believe you have a serious rival to string theory.
Are you going to actually post anything or are you just passing time until the kettle's boiled?
Little actual content.
Zero evidence.
You have given no clue whatsoever as what you're talking about, other than, possibly, that you believe you have a serious rival to string theory.
Are you going to actually post anything or are you just passing time until the kettle's boiled?
MjolnirPants
Registered Member
Umm, MirrorPi is being dishonest here... Those bizarre comments that mirror man is posting are most certainly NOT being posted out of context. MirrorPi has actually said the things that mirrorman is implying here on other forums.
mirror man
Registered Member
Well, I am sure you cannot really mean this. A lot of so called scientific words are actually emotional responses, in a kind of tit for tat against some opposing emotional response. I'm a self taught musician, and seventeen years ago I had a rather loud thought come rushing through my head, as I practiced my scales on the guitar. It said "reverse the formula of the major scale" I did this and a few weeks later, following that logic, I saw the marriage point of masculine and feminine cycles/tonality. That was enough to keep looking!
mirror man
Registered Member
If you haven't read any of my work, then I'm afraid you are assuming blindly.
Your comments have been pretty pathetic so far, I really do hope you spare some time to try and show where I have gone wrong in my work. Oh, that is if you read it before you "debunk" me. That will get me to see the error of my ways I'm sure.
Your comments have been pretty pathetic so far, I really do hope you spare some time to try and show where I have gone wrong in my work. Oh, that is if you read it before you "debunk" me. That will get me to see the error of my ways I'm sure.
I've made no assumptions.
If you're referring to my call for cesspooling this thread that's because you have failed to post anything of substance.
I haven't read any of your work since it hasn't been presented.
You haven't posted anything other than incoherent claims and musical reminiscences, so there's nothing to debunk.
Pathetic?
Pot/ kettle.
If you're referring to my call for cesspooling this thread that's because you have failed to post anything of substance.
I haven't read any of your work since it hasn't been presented.
You haven't posted anything other than incoherent claims and musical reminiscences, so there's nothing to debunk.
Pathetic?
Pot/ kettle.
Last edited:
There doesn't seem to be much point in joining in here. "mirror man" is one of the trolls over at Physorg, who has drawn another couple of trolls here now. This is the mirror man he is pretending to be:
homepage .ntlworld. com/lggl007/
www . youtube. com/watch?v=ES5q6R8DGY0
Buty really he is the troll Occidental over at Physorg. He's using replies made in other conversations to other people. If you are satisfied with this type of procedure, then I doubt anything can come from this type of deceit.
What is concerning is the mentality uncovered at such places as Physorg.
That people have a basic cruelty that allows them to use deceit in order to
allow themselves the belief that they are acting for the truth.
So long. Have fun.
homepage .ntlworld. com/lggl007/
www . youtube. com/watch?v=ES5q6R8DGY0
Buty really he is the troll Occidental over at Physorg. He's using replies made in other conversations to other people. If you are satisfied with this type of procedure, then I doubt anything can come from this type of deceit.
What is concerning is the mentality uncovered at such places as Physorg.
That people have a basic cruelty that allows them to use deceit in order to
allow themselves the belief that they are acting for the truth.
So long. Have fun.
Mirror man and mirrorPI might be the same schizoid. What mirror man is saying sounds like a waste of time named Boneidol at Pysorg who is mirrorPI here. Read Science:Truth or Fraud at Physorg, Boneidol's work.
Confusing? You aint seen nothing yet. Wait till he starts his shiet here.
Actually, I'm going to put my "shiet" onto a set of videos destined for youtube. I guess I'll be able to at least put accross the data without shiysters like you being able to spin your little webs.
MjolnirPants
Registered Member
MirrorPi:
If your posts are being reproduced here out of context, then please start a thread where you can re-post them here, in context.
www . physforum . com/index.php?showtopic=22838&view=findpost&p=367608
In fact, why don't you reproduce the above post here, and then argue in the defense of the linked article, as you did on physorg?
For those who don't like to follow off-site links, here's a taste of what the article is about:
Why don't you demonstrate your intengrity, instead of merely claiming it?
If your posts are being reproduced here out of context, then please start a thread where you can re-post them here, in context.
www . physforum . com/index.php?showtopic=22838&view=findpost&p=367608
In fact, why don't you reproduce the above post here, and then argue in the defense of the linked article, as you did on physorg?
For those who don't like to follow off-site links, here's a taste of what the article is about:
I've taken the liberty of bolding the most outrageous and patently false claims in this snippet.Scientists, by contrast, have the arrogance to claim that their weird ideas are nothing less than the Truth, that their statements somehow have 'universal and eternal validity'. They see themselves as more omniscient and omnipotent than the Pope. But scientists do not make practical things, they only come up with theories (which, by the way, are invariably rejected by other scientists again). Scientists are not checked by commercial realities nor by clients who ask for a service. Scientists can put together a torture chamber under the pretence that this will somehow advance the cause of science, and few people will object.
Scientists do not make practical things and they should not be paid to do other things either. Without scientists, the world would have ended up with far better computers. Think of the vast amounts of money poured into universities in vain. Think of the huge wast of time and efforts of students and staff. Universities should not be paid with money forcibly extracted from common people to allow scientists to basically do what they like without accountibility. The peer review that is common among scientists is like allowing criminals to judge their mates! They fail on the most important criterion: impartiality!
Why don't you demonstrate your intengrity, instead of merely claiming it?
MjolnirPants
Registered Member
To prove correct the claims you've made in this one, maybe? :shrug:And why would I want to start any thread here? I haven't started one so far. You've provided a link to a thread. If anyone is bored enough to get into it over at physorg, best of luck to them.
I don't know about you, but I prefer to give people a reason to trust my judgement, rather than simply expect them to because I said so.
Regardless, until you actually show that all those existant criticisms of you which have been justified over and over (and over and over and over...) are wrong, people are generally going to believe them. It's only those who won't bother to look at your posting history on physorg or elsewhere who will buy your line. And those people, frankly, will buy any BS that's presented to them.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.